Wednesday, 13 February 2013

I TOLD YOU SO!

THE LAST OF THE ALLEGED NAIVE LABOR TWIRPS...defacto death of Labor

Justice Minister Jason Clare and Sports Minister Kate Lundy were the last of Labor's previously unsullied, comparitively vestal, now plainly, demonstrably merely incompetent, impotent potential challengers to Julia G.

The Gillard lady is to be cherished by Abbott: she is daily forcing her acolytes to shoot themselves in the proverbial foot. The Sports Catastrophe is merely the daily latest.
Being typically devoid of specifics ensures that this may be the denouement – the defacto death of Labor.
And this deadly inability to understand that in the world of Justice there is nowhere to hide!

Labor values, Labor brand, how pathetic they are.
If it is not the micro / macro detail, then it will be broad asinine lack of purpose, the arrogant assumption that we are all stupid and will not remember their disasters – or their plain paucity of political / intellectual / logistical nous.
One runs out of numbers – why even the categories of their mere catastrophes challenge my didactic skills.
It is all plainly streches the incompetent word. Abbott will have to ask the dictionaries: Gilliarded? Gilliardism?
Leftacy? I feel this is too broad...

Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Grove
East St Kilda 3183
03 9 525 9299

LINK:
The Gillard production of Wag The Dog
I TOLD YOU SO ON MONDAY AS ABOVE LINK!

####################################################################################################
COMPLETE LINKS:

BLOG ARCHIVE

LINK:
The Gillard production of Wag The Dog
I TOLD YOU SO ON MONDAY AS ABOVE LINK!

##################################################

Police cold on ACC doping claims

NO CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS FIVE MONTHS AFTER ACC DAMNED
SPORTING CODES
Police cold on ACC doping claims

BY:CHIP LE GRAND AND PAUL MALEY

From:The Australian

February 13, 2013 12:00AM

THERE are no active criminal investigations into allegations raised by the Australian Crime Commission's year-long examination of organised crime and drugs in sport despite state-based police having been aware of its findings for the past five months.

ACC chief executive John Lawler, under pressure to defend his agency's handling of last week's sensational report warning crime gangs were infiltrating the major professional sports, said the operation had largely gathered intelligence rather than evidence and was not intended to result in arrests. "The purpose of such an operation is not to make arrests," Mr Lawler told Senate estimates yesterday. "The purpose is to understand the threat, risk and vulnerabilities."

##################

ACC drops the ball over probe into drugs in sport

The Australian Crime Commission is covering old, unsubstantiated ground

BY:TIM PRIEST

From:The Australian

February 13, 2013 12:00AM

IN the early 1980s a revolutionary crime fighting unit named the National Crime Authority was set up by prime minister Bob Hawke to halt the rapid rise of organised crime in this country.

.......

.......

But the NCA became a victim of its own success and took on more than it could handle. . Prosecutions fell away, the budget was slashed and the organisation lost its way. It became a political toy for successive federal governments looking for quick, cheap kudos from short-term operations that could generate publicity at a moment's notice.

Long-term operational plans were shelved as their media return was too slow for headline-hungry politicians.

The NCA stumbled through the 90s with an occasional, well-earned success but it never lived up to its early reputation and became an expensive, overrated crime fighting unit.

#######################

ACC's no-evidence approach is starting to prove da...

ACC's no-evidence approach is starting to prove damaging

BY:PATRICK SMITH

From:The Australian

February 13, 2013 12:00AM

THE Australian Crime Commission had its moment in the international sun last Thursday. So did Justice Minister Jason Clare and Sports Minister Kate Lundy. They may never smile again; their grim reaper look almost certainly welded into place.

##############################################################

Accused clubs have little to fear

Concerns over slew of casualties ease

Accused clubs have little to fear

BY:BRENT READ

From:The Australian

February 13, 2013 12:00AM

THE darkest day in Australian sporting history? Not if yesterday is any indication. Less than a week after the Australian Crime Commission went public with claims that drug use was rampant across the codes, five of the six NRL clubs implicated in the report emerged from meetings with the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency confident they had little to fear.

##############################################################
Gagged Dons unable to defend James Hird

Gagged Dons unable to defend James Hird

Clubs are feeling frustrated by lack of specifics

BY:GREG DENHAM

From:The Australian

February 13, 2013 12:00AM

#################################

Dope cloud may take years to clear: Fahey

From:AAP

February 13, 2013 9:14AM

THE cloud of uncertainty cast over Australian athletes by allegations of doping and corruption could take years to clear.

Monday, 11 February 2013

Neil Mitchell and values

From: g87

Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 12:13 PM

To: mitchell n

Subject: Neil Mitchell and values

Neil Mitchell and values

Once again you Neil Mitchell are ensconced in being nice to criminals.

This morning you were discussing the idea floated by some of forcing some of the worst murderers to disclose what they did with the bodies of children – so the families had at least that much to live with.

Not according to you, Neil Mitchell!

Oh – you used your favourite cliched excuse: ‘’we are much better than them.’’

You have used this mealy – mouthed justification in sooooo many leftist ways – in sooooo many realms.

The death penalty

Even Anita Coby’s murderers, the Russell St monsters, rapist – murderers of little children, Nazi monsters – no, you would even protect Hitler’s life under the aegis that WE are too good for that!

Speak for yourself! I OBJECT TO YOUR ‘’WE’’ nomenclature!

DO YOU KNOW HOW THEY RAPED AND DROWNED ANITA COBY???!!

According to you – murdering 6 million of my brethren – including my toddler aunt Veronka Scheffer – does not warrant the meagre price of execution!

SURELY THIS IS CLOSE TO SUGGESTING THAT THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTE VALUES THAT JUSTIFIES HOLDING A PERSON RESPONSIBLE VIA THE PERCEIVED VALUES / MORALITY OF DENYING THEM THE RIGHT TO LIVE!
THIS IS ALL PATHETICALLY CLOSE TO SUGGESTING THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTE VALUES .....!

http://mediaspinners.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/in-name-of-veronka-scheffer-i-denounce.html

http://socialistdystopia.blogspot.com.au/

I say to you – there are millions who vitiate and regard as immoral the immoral idea that we are too good to cause the meagre so – called ultimate price?

Eichmann?

Of course we know your values – they even encompass freedom of speech to David Irving

I have written to you that your espousal of freedom of speech – with no responsibilities – is one of the obscenities of your ilk.

Why I suspect you would espouse the ‘DUKAKIS’ morality!

Indeed – what would you expect to be done to the rapist murderer of someone perilously close to you?

ARE YOU TOO GOOD!?

Michael Dukakis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_DukakisShare

Michael Stanley Dukakis (/dʉˈkɑːkɨs/; born November 3, 1933; Greek: .... of the debate, asked Dukakis, "Governor, if Kitty Dukakis [his wife] were raped and ... and I think you know that I've opposed the death penalty during all of my life", ...

COULD YOU FORGIVE THE NAZI ON HIS DEATHBED!??
I have seen a great essay on this – and may get permission to post it on my blog!

ANSWER IT NM!!

You see Neil Mitchell – if Irving on his tour around the world – which would have included Australia if the Government had not banned him – had said that Hitler did not kill enough Jews – instead of his obscene refrain in denying the holocaust – you would have debated this with him!

YOU would have put into the public domain – even THIS derivative of his many obscenities! YOU DO NOT GET IT MITCHELL: BY DEBATING MATTERS YOU IMPLY – NAY EXPRESS – THAT THERE IS A DEBATING POINT TO BE PROFERED IN THE MEDIA!!!

THIS IS SICK!!

‘’We are too good ‘’ to deny freedom of speech – no matter the cost!

AND THAT IS THE ULTIMATE INDICTMENT OF YOUR PERSON – THERE ARE NO IMMORALITIES THAT YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO INDICT VIA THE ONLY SANCTION THAT IS EVEN REMOTELY PROPORTIONAL!

YOU ACCUSED JEWS OF THE ULTIMATE OBSCENITY IN OCT 2000 EX THE INTIFADA- NE’ER an APOLOGY FROM THE WE ARE TOO GOOD ENTITY!!

AND of course you have been too scared to put me on the air since I took you to the ABA.

In due course I will put it all on my blog: it still will not elicit a response from you!

Shame on you!

Geoff Seidner

The Gillard production of Wag The Dog

The drugs in sport business is looking like the Gillard inversion of Wag The Dog – a brilliant 1997 Clinton – based film about how to create political diversions by declaring war with the help of a spin doctor [Dustin Hoffman]

The Hollywood version had great humour leavened with pathos and superb story line – all lacking with Labor humourless denizens.

Pathetically another pair of Labor ministers will have discredited themselves – and there will be no one to challenge the lady Mouse That Roared. [Peter Sellers 1955]

My goodness! They cannot even do original catastrophes!

Geoff Seidner

13 Alston Gr

East St Kilda 3183

03 9525 9299

Wag the Dog (1997) - IMDb

www.imdb.com/title/tt0120885/Share

Directed by Barry Levinson. With Dustin Hoffman, Robert De Niro, Anne Heche, Denis Leary. Before elections, a spin-doctor and a Hollywood producer join ...

Full cast and crew - Plot Summary - Memorable quotes - Videos

Wag the Dog - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wag_the_Dog
Wag the Dog is a 1997 black comedy film starring Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro, co-starring Anne Heche, Denis Leary and William H. Macy about a ...
Plot - Cast - Title - Motss and Evans

###########################################################################

The Mouse That Roared - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mouse_That_RoaredShare
The Mouse That Roared is a 1955 Cold War satirical novel by Irish-American writer Leonard Wibberley, which launched a series of satirical books about an ...
Plot - Reception - Adaptations - Notes
The Mouse That Roared (1959) - IMDb

www.imdb.com/title/tt0053084/
Directed by Jack Arnold. With Peter Sellers, Jean Seberg, William Hartnell, David Kossoff. An impoverished backward nation declares a war on the United States ...
Full cast and crew - The Mouse That Roared Trailer - Photo Gallery - Soundtracks
The Mouse that Roared TRailer - YouTube

► 2:25► 2:25

www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7L7WLFBYR4

May 17, 2008 - Uploaded by troz2000
Trailer for the 1959 film "The Mouse that Roared" starring Peter Sellers and Jean Seberg.

Friday, 8 February 2013

BELABOURED LABOR BRAND / VALUES

From: g87

Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:35 PM

To: The Herald Sun

Subject: BELABOURED LABOR BRAND / VALUES

BELABOURED LABOR BRAND / VALUES

First the paucity of original ideas, the humiliation of not even bothering to respond anymore to news and opinion pieces that daily decimate them.
Then contemplate the amazing socialist humiliation - for decades using, inverting via the irrational terminological abuse of the 'economic rationalism' term.

Anyone remember the H R Nichols Society - much abused by the left? For years Australian Labor inverted 'rationalism' into their nether world of the economically illiterate troglodytes: witness the 10.000 word essays of Rudd and Swan in the Monthly.

Julia has similarly re - defined the dictionary in so many ways.
Now even her mob finally realise that socialism / social justice / socialist anything is bad news in the electorate.

Hawke / Keating got away with it because they had some good people who temporarily turned away from socialism: Hawke / Keating and the late, great Senator John Button.
Anyone want to compare Craig Emmerson with the Senator? Puhleez!

The current modus vivendi is now a useless attempt to make themselves a small target - because no viable alternative exists for JG: they have all been discredited in their lame attempt at defending the dear lady.

But now those in marginal electorates will be the progenitors for change for change's sake.

Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Grove
East St Kida 3183
03 9525 9299

Tuesday, 5 February 2013

Hi Tom Elliot - You are a 'Mentsch!

From: g87

Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 3:13 PM

To: Tom Elliott

Subject: Hi Tom,You are a 'Mentsch!

Hi Tom,

You are a 'Mentsch!

Regards

Geoff

Mentsch - definition of Mentsch by the Free Online Dictionary ...

www.thefreedictionary.com/Mentsch
n. pl. mensch·es or mensch·en (m n sh n) Informal. A person having admirable characteristics, such as fortitude and firmness of purpose: "He radiates the kind of ...
Ask the Rabbi, JewishAnswers.org » What's a Mentsch?

www.jewishanswers.org › MiscellaneousShare
Question: What is a Mentsch? I understand in German it means a person, however in Judaism, Mentsch has more meaning. It is a good person – one who helps ...
Mentsch - My Jewish Learning

www.myjewishlearning.com/.../Being_a_Mentsch.shtml
On being a mentsch--an upstanding member of society--and leading an ethical life.
Urban Dictionary: mentsch

www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mentsch
A German word which, in Yiddish, means "a good person". A mench is a particularly good person with the qualities one would hope for in a dear frien...

#########################################################################

##########################################################################

From: Tom Elliott

Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 2:57 PM

To: g87

Subject: Re: J'ACCUSE DREYFUS!!! et al

Thanks for all the advice!
Regards
Tom

Tom Elliott
Drive Presenter

3AW & Magic1278

Media House, Level 7, 655 Collins Street, Docklands VIC 3008 3aw.com.au | magic1278.com.au
FAIRFAX RADIO NETWORK
2UE Sydney | 3AW & Magic 1278 Melbourne | 4BC & 4BH Brisbane | 6PR & 96fm Perth |Syndication | Digital Courier | Radio Monitoring
Disclaimer: This email may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. Please notify the sender and delete this document if you have received it in error. We do not guarantee this email is error or virus free. If this is a commercial electronic message under the Spam Act, you can unsubscribe by return email to the sender with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

On 5 February 2013 14:38, g87 <g87@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

Hi Tom,

I will survive without the transcript or audio. I do not need to prove anything – you have by default proven the accuracy of what passed between us.

My comments did not need clarification / for anyone’s ‘’benefit.’’

However you have also perhaps have shown to any political animal that one day you may feel ensconsed / secure enough in your Fairfax media job to do proper interviews.

To ask some real questions from politicians – that is the nature of professional interviews.

Allow callers to speak without feeling the neurosis about offending the dearie politicians on the left.

And not allow pollies to unilaterally refuse to answer questions / need protection from you or callers. Indeed – that was the condition of the interview that there were no questions! Why agree to give Labor free air time if they do not allow themselves to be questioned – other than you ‘motherhood’ bleatings.

Furthermore your so called ‘summary for benefit of listeners’ bore no relationship to what I had said to the moment that you cut me off. Indeed – why were you in such a hurry to silence me?

I was not being offensive, even remotely.

Indeed – your motivations – to ensure JD [ J’accuse Dreyfus] will come back for future interviews and will be protected from answering any questions – is obvious to all reading my blog.

I respectfully advise – that Derryn Hinch would not have done this.

He and I have had the odd excellent debate.

We still do not agree on compulsory voting.......

################################################

To our eyes the USA has a lot of absolute fanatics in positions of power by being elected by fanatical voters with a lot in the middle not bothering to vote at all.

This is how Australia keeps fanatics out of Federal politics.

http://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/1556436-keeping-fanatics-out-power.html

Australia became less polarised because it introduced political measures that made it difficult for extremists to gain political representation. Compulsory voting was one such measure. In America, voluntary voting means that the extremists are great assets to a political campaign. It is the extremists that get out to vote, and convince others to vote as well. To keep the extremists happy, the American political parties must pander to their interests, and this can result in a polarised society. In Australia; however, the extremists are not really important at all. The political party that they have chosen can simply take them for granted and ignore them. The party can then devote its resources on the swinging voters that will decide the election. As a consequence, it is the moderates from the middle-ground that need to be kept happy. Consequently, both parties position themselves as moderates.
Preferential voting is another innovation that keeps extremists out of Australian parliament. The system forces voters to rank candidates in order of preference. When the ballots are collectively tallied, it is the candidate that is the least hated, rather than most liked, that represents the people. In the 1990s, the system kept the extremist Pauline Hanson out of parliament even though she won the most votes in her electorate.

Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/1556436-keeping-fanatics-out-power-extremist-politicians.html#ixzz2JzYlfLaI

################################################################################

From: Tom Elliott

Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 1:50 PM

To: g87

Subject: Re: J'ACCUSE DREYFUS!!! et al

No, we don't provide transcripts. You can, however, buy one from media monitors.

Regards

Tom

On 05/02/2013, at 1:16 PM, "g87" <g87@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

Hi Tom

I was very clear in whast I said and how I said it.

Could you send me a transcript and audio from 5, 10 pm and 5. 25 pm?

Thanks

Geoff

From: Tom Elliott

Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 12:46 PM

To: g87

Subject: Re: J'ACCUSE DREYFUS!!! et al

Hi Geoff
I wasn't trying to be disingenuous - I was just struggling to understand your point!
As a result, I tried to summarise it for the benefit of listeners.
You may be pleased to know that liberal MP Josh Frydenburg came on the show a week ago to talk about the ALP's confused attitude towards Israel.
Regards
Tom

Tom Elliott
Drive Presenter

3AW & Magic1278

Media House, Level 7, 655 Collins Street, Docklands VIC 3008 3aw.com.au | magic1278.com.au
FAIRFAX RADIO NETWORK
2UE Sydney | 3AW & Magic 1278 Melbourne | 4BC & 4BH Brisbane | 6PR & 96fm Perth |Syndication | Digital Courier | Radio Monitoring
Disclaimer: This email may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. Please notify the sender and delete this document if you have received it in error. We do not guarantee this email is error or virus free. If this is a commercial electronic message under the Spam Act, you can unsubscribe by return email to the sender with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

On 5 February 2013 12:25, g87 <g87@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

Dear Tom Elliott

I suppose thanks are profferred for taking my call: but try not to be so openly disingenuous next time?

Geoff Seidner

13 Alston Gr East St Kilda 3183

03 9525 9299

Tom Elliott tried to censor me re Dreyfus

J'ACCUSE DREYFUS!!!

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax Media does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files.

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax Media does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files.

The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax Media does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files.

Tom Elliott tried to censor me re Dreyfus

This post must be read in context of earlier post.

LINK:
J'ACCUSE DREYFUS!

Tom Elliot took my call at approx 5.18 pm yesterday on his 'Drive' Melbourne radio programme on 3AW
Elliot was about to interview Dreyfus.
Someone should send me a tape of Elliot's conv with GS and Dreyfus. Maybe it is on 3AW Website?
I use my memory for constructing this summary of my conv: having no recall of the J'accused one's conv with Elliott.

###########################################
Elliott:
Hello Geoff
GS:
I am amazed that the new Attorney General, when he was Climate Lunacy Secretary to Minister Greg Combet used the DENIER moniker to describe climate change sceptics - in spite of being asked to not continue doing so.

Furthemore he refused to support Julia Gillard in her lone attempts to support Israel on the Palestine vote.... as Australian Governments have always traditionally done.

[I mentioned Danby and Gillard generously and barely got the word Bob Carr out when Elliott decided not to allow further humiliation for Dreyfus - who followed me on air.]

Elliot: Well Geoff,Bob Carr persuaded Julia the best way to go on the Palestine vote.''

Sadly I should have made notes earlier - I simply cannot remember some bits.
The above is a fair, limited derivation of what happened on air.
Of course Elliot did not discuss my tangent with D!!

What I found interesting that Elliott seconds later misused my 'moniker' word with Dreyfus - refering to ''Dreyfus' moniker''

I will try to send this to Tom Elliott - perhaps I can shame him into treating non - government acolytes with respect.

Geoff Seidner

J'ACCUSE DREYFUS!!!

Background.

Mark Dreyfus - is Julia Gillard's new Attorney General replacing the pathetic Nicola Roxon.
Dreyfus has attacked the commendable Christopher Pyne for Pyne's parodic criticism of Julia Gillard's Ministry and mode of government. Indeed Julia and her government cannot be assessed via anything but a great parody.
There must be thousands - am in a hurry so here is only one as below link. My blog is replete with my own efforts.

Gillard's end of the world spoof is life imitating...

As can be seen from the links - Dreyfus is an outrage,
A hypocritical outrageous humbug of a man.

J'ACCUSE DREYFUS!!!

He attacks Pyne - who is foundation member of Parliamentary Friends of Israel for an alleged Nazi comment indicting Julia's government - when by any practical / logical / intellectual / moral criteria - Pyne was refering to a pathetic film that has been widely parodied! Why not impeach the thousands of these parodies, Dreyfus?
The morally upstanding Pyne - apologized yesterday when he plainly should not have bothered. [see link below]
Contemplate that Dreyfus HAS USED THE GOEBBELS ANALOGY TO ATTACK PYNE!AND THAT WAS AN OBSCENITY!
Dreyfus - a Jew - defaming one of the best friends of Jewish people with this obscene moniker! Shame on you - J'accuse!
Dreyfus - a former underling of Climate Lunacy Minister Greg Combet - has designated Climate change sceptics as DENIERS! ALL BELABORED LABOR MEMBERS HAVE BEEN ON RECORD - HAVING REPEATED THIS MODERN - DAY OBSCENITY OF THE LEFT. SO MUCH FOR THE GREATEST MORALL ISSUE OF OUR TIME! [K07]
IT GETS WORSE _ THEY HAVE BEEN ASKED TO APOLOGIZE AND CEASE USING THE DENIER LABEL - AND THESE UNSPEAKABLE MORONS HAVE ALL REFUSED: EXCEPT FOR MICHAEL DANBY - WHO IS OF COURSE ALSO JEWISH. Pyne has indeed been on record as asking the lefy to cease / desist from appending denier nomenclature: to no avail!
But it gets even worse: Dreyfus had many interviews yesterday - repeating the above with unpleasant pride. Decent people should shame Dreyfus by complaining to this humbug of a man via appending Emile Zola's great book. Furthermore, this government should die of shame - if that is possible.
Detritus Dreyfus refused to allow questions when interviewed by Melbourne Radio station 3AW's Tom Elliott. I HAD A GO AT HIM AT 5.15 pm yesterday ON AIR - BEFORE ELLIOT CUT ME OFF! BUT I GOT IN A MINUTE'S WORTH OF ELOQUENT DIATRIBE. This will be on the next posting on this blog - Socialist Dystopia.

Geoff Seidner

February (9)