From: g87
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 11:16 AM
To: Tom Elliott
Cc: Tom Elliott
Subject: TOM ELLIOTT: YOU HAVE CHANGED....
ONLY ONE THEME #1.1: TOM ELLIOTT
Hello Tom
It is regrettable that for weeks now you now refuse to allow me on air –
and thus refuse any criticism of yourself.
Your panel operators manifestly play games with me when I phone
you...
So be it. Thus I have decided that from time to time I will write on my
blog whatever I think is appropriate relating to you and of others of
course.
However too many people simply do not appreciate that there are astonishing
levels of bunk, drivel and gibberish espoused by you under the aegis of fair
commentary.
HEREIN IS merely one email I send you – only one
theme.
I have decided to try to hold people like you responsible for sins of
omission and / commission under the generalised title of:
Only One Theme.
It will be readily understood that you are the first entry under this ‘Only
One Theme’ theme.
Here it is Tom: you can of course respond in any way you wish. If you care
to respond at all.
But you surely will not – because of your position in having become an
UNREMITTING HUMBUG REMAINS.
You used to respond to my criticism – but no more! https://www.google.com.au/#q=geoff+seidner+tom
Socialist Dystopia: Once again you copped it- As last time ...
socialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../once-again-you-copped-it-as-last-time....
OH TOM!! - RE SUE BUTTLER YOUR HOST MINUTES AGO!
socialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../oh-tom-re-sue-buttler-your-host-minut...
Indeed you were, Tom – indeed you were. - Socialist Dystopia
socialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../indeed-you-were-tom-indeed-you-wer...
ITEM 3 sent to tom ex JEWISH VIRTUAL LIBRARY
cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../item-3-sent-to-tom-ex-jewish-v...
So here are the details that you may try to impeach.
Tom Elliott and 3.22pm Thursday 19 September 2014
You had a great caller who was allowed by you to say that Muslims are
allowed to lie.
I do not do justice to this caller which must have bee=n around 3.20 pm.
approx.
Then you took a call from an angry Muslim who claimed that there are three
examples where Muslims are allowed to lie. He gave an example about lying to
one’s wife to keep family peace.
[there was no femininist in sight... there must have been some girl -
people / femininists angry at this – and other femininist issues resident in
Islam... but not on your show...]
But you stood up for the girl people with your asinine ‘’does my bum look
big in this dress’'?’’
Yes Tom – you even allowed him to refer to ‘’the real issue is
Jewish terrorism’’
You barely remonstrated A LA: ‘’WHY DID YOU SAY THAT?’’
Well Tom – you then fielded a call from Michael a few minutes later...
Michael who said:
‘’The World Trade Centre was not bombed by Jewish Terrorists.
Lakemba does not have Jews as third Columnists...’’
And this was your response Elliott to Michael:
‘’YES , WELL THE CALLER WAS PRETTY REASONABLE UNTIL THEN’’ !!!! [Ref to the
Jewish terrorism bit]
Excuse me?
- Tell me Elliot – where was plain curiosity in you; that ensured you did not ask him to categorise the 3 scenarios of Muslims being allowed to lie?
- Did it never occur to you that he gave only one example?
- CAN YOU NOT COUNT? YOU CLAIM SUCH GRAVITAS FOR GRAMMAR – WHAT ABOUT 1 – 2 – 3 AND THE BAREST ELEMENTS OF ARITHMETIC?
- Did it occur to you that Muslims are allowed to lie OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED OR NOT SANCTIONED**** IN THEIR HOLY BOOKS THE KORAN AND QUORAN??
- Never mind that Jews are not remotely involved by any criterion of common sense or decency criteria!
- So I have herein appending links at the head of this essay that will show you what a weak person you can be.
- your duplicitous, silly behaviour in suggesting ‘’Israel is not as bad as apartheid South Africa’’ – context is in my notes somewhere - and will be explicated. If i deem it worthwhile
- Indeed – there are so many of your on air comments that are hopelessly duplicitous – that I could easily become obsessed with merly YOU INTERNICINE HUMBUG!
- Understand that I understand that you are merely a coward.
- But also understand how morally upstanding people like Chris Kenny and Greg Sheridan manage ‘it.’ Too much to expect of professional chimera - cultists like you?
Please feel free to respond – all this will be on my blog within minutes:
you can respond any way you like. IF YOUR COWARDICE WILL ENABLE
‘’IT’’
Yours Sincerely
Geoff Seidner
*****Understand that sanction word is an
antonym
*****sanction
ˈsaŋ(k)ʃ(ə)n/
verb
past
tense: sanctioned;
past participle: sanctioned
-
1.give official permission or approval for (an action)."the scheme was sanctioned by the court"
-
2.impose a sanction or penalty on."foreigners in France illegally should be sent home, their employers sanctioned and border controls tightened up"
synonyms: punish, discipline someone for "the penalties for water pollution are frail in comparison with those available to sanction traditional crime"
