- Tell me Elliot – where was plain curiosity in you; that ensured you did not ask him to categorise the 3 scenarios of Muslims being allowed to lie?
- Did it never occur to you that he gave only one example?
- CAN YOU NOT COUNT? YOU CLAIM SUCH GRAVITAS FOR GRAMMAR – WHAT ABOUT 1 – 2 – 3 AND THE BAREST ELEMENTS OF ARITHMETIC?
- Did it occur to you that Muslims are allowed to lie OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED OR NOT SANCTIONED**** IN THEIR HOLY BOOKS THE KORAN AND QUORAN??
- Never mind that Jews are not remotely involved by any criterion of common sense or decency criteria!
- So I have herein appending links at the head of this essay that will show you what a weak person you can be.
- your duplicitous, silly behaviour in suggesting ‘’Israel is not as bad as apartheid South Africa’’ – context is in my notes somewhere - and will be explicated. If i deem it worthwhile
- Indeed – there are so many of your on air comments that are hopelessly duplicitous – that I could easily become obsessed with merly YOU INTERNICINE HUMBUG!
- Understand that I understand that you are merely a coward.
- But also understand how morally upstanding people like Chris Kenny and Greg Sheridan manage ‘it.’ Too much to expect of professional chimera - cultists like you?
Friday, 19 September 2014
ONLY ONE THEME #1.1: TOM ELLIOTT
It is regrettable that for weeks now you now refuse to allow me on air – and thus refuse any criticism of yourself.
Your panel operators manifestly play games with me when I phone you...
So be it. Thus I have decided that from time to time I will write on my blog whatever I think is appropriate relating to you and of others of course.
However too many people simply do not appreciate that there are astonishing levels of bunk, drivel and gibberish espoused by you under the aegis of fair commentary.
HEREIN IS merely one email I send you – only one theme.
I have decided to try to hold people like you responsible for sins of omission and / commission under the generalised title of:
Only One Theme.
It will be readily understood that you are the first entry under this ‘Only One Theme’ theme.
Here it is Tom: you can of course respond in any way you wish. If you care to respond at all.
But you surely will not – because of your position in having become an UNREMITTING HUMBUG REMAINS.
You used to respond to my criticism – but no more! https://www.google.com.au/#q=geoff+seidner+tom
So here are the details that you may try to impeach.
Tom Elliott and 3.22pm Thursday 19 September 2014
You had a great caller who was allowed by you to say that Muslims are allowed to lie.
I do not do justice to this caller which must have bee=n around 3.20 pm. approx.
Then you took a call from an angry Muslim who claimed that there are three examples where Muslims are allowed to lie. He gave an example about lying to one’s wife to keep family peace.
[there was no femininist in sight... there must have been some girl - people / femininists angry at this – and other femininist issues resident in Islam... but not on your show...]
But you stood up for the girl people with your asinine ‘’does my bum look big in this dress’'?’’
Yes Tom – you even allowed him to refer to ‘’the real issue is Jewish terrorism’’
You barely remonstrated A LA: ‘’WHY DID YOU SAY THAT?’’
Well Tom – you then fielded a call from Michael a few minutes later... Michael who said:
‘’The World Trade Centre was not bombed by Jewish Terrorists.
Lakemba does not have Jews as third Columnists...’’
And this was your response Elliott to Michael:
‘’YES , WELL THE CALLER WAS PRETTY REASONABLE UNTIL THEN’’ !!!! [Ref to the Jewish terrorism bit]
Please feel free to respond – all this will be on my blog within minutes: you can respond any way you like. IF YOUR COWARDICE WILL ENABLE ‘’IT’’
*****Understand that sanction word is an antonym
past tense: sanctioned; past participle: sanctioned
Posted by Geoff Seidner at 11:17 am
Thursday, 18 September 2014
Are they mad, bad, evil or merely wilfully blind?
I sometimes amaze myself to discover the range of material on my blogs!
See merely google - the links below to be ‘discovered’ via the words ‘GEOFF SEIDNER WILFULLY BLIND’
Note what initiated this; see link immediately below.
So I ask rhetorically: what is the point of it all?
Can anyone tell me what I have achieved via merely this theme – which really IS a major theme.
Has anyone ever persuaded anyone to change – those that can merely be – over – generously so described as wilfully blind?
Other than the lamentable Goldstone – has anyone else anywhere ever admitted that they were wrong and assure anyone that they would modify their behaviour in any way in the future?
I suspect that Goldstone only apologized because life was uncomfortable for him. Perhaps similar to Malcolm Fraser who could not attend social events without being lacerated for THE DISMISSAL!
Malcolm also lost a fortune with the underwriting of Lloyds – so what did the ‘great’ man do?
HE SWITCHED SIDES: BECAME THE CLASSICAL MANIFESTATION – AT BEST OF THOSE WHO BECAME ECONOMICALLY AND POLITICALLY IRRATIONAL!
DO A GOOGLE SEARCH FOR: geoff seidner economic rationalism
A lot of fun!
In case I get down on myself – has anyone anywhere ever... etc achieved anything?
I know a radio commentator in Melbourne who has made a career out of remaining a professional humbug by regularly defacto agreeing with Israel haters.
EG ‘’Israel is not as bad as APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA’
He plainly refused me the right to remonstrate with him!
Oh – he then minutes later ‘generously [!] allows on air an Israel rationalist and agrees begrudgingly that ‘’Israel is a democracy’’
Can anyone tell me there is any point in trying to correct this cabal of evil?
Or do we sit it out until Jew hatred becomes socially unacceptable again?
13 Alston Gr East St Kilda 3183
03 9525 9299
SEE MY MANY LINKS ON WILFULLY BLIND!
Posted by Geoff Seidner at 11:10 am