- Tell me Elliot – where was plain curiosity in you; that ensured you did not ask him to categorise the 3 scenarios of Muslims being allowed to lie?
- Did it never occur to you that he gave only one example?
- CAN YOU NOT COUNT? YOU CLAIM SUCH GRAVITAS FOR GRAMMAR – WHAT ABOUT 1 – 2 – 3 AND THE BAREST ELEMENTS OF ARITHMETIC?
- Did it occur to you that Muslims are allowed to lie OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED OR NOT SANCTIONED**** IN THEIR HOLY BOOKS THE KORAN AND QUORAN??
- Never mind that Jews are not remotely involved by any criterion of common sense or decency criteria!
- So I have herein appending links at the head of this essay that will show you what a weak person you can be.
- your duplicitous, silly behaviour in suggesting ‘’Israel is not as bad as apartheid South Africa’’ – context is in my notes somewhere - and will be explicated. If i deem it worthwhile
- Indeed – there are so many of your on air comments that are hopelessly duplicitous – that I could easily become obsessed with merly YOU INTERNICINE HUMBUG!
- Understand that I understand that you are merely a coward.
- But also understand how morally upstanding people like Chris Kenny and Greg Sheridan manage ‘it.’ Too much to expect of professional chimera - cultists like you?
Friday, 19 September 2014
ONLY ONE THEME #1.1: TOM ELLIOTT
ONLY ONE THEME #1.1: TOM ELLIOTT
It is regrettable that for weeks now you now refuse to allow me on air – and thus refuse any criticism of yourself.
Your panel operators manifestly play games with me when I phone you...
So be it. Thus I have decided that from time to time I will write on my blog whatever I think is appropriate relating to you and of others of course.
However too many people simply do not appreciate that there are astonishing levels of bunk, drivel and gibberish espoused by you under the aegis of fair commentary.
HEREIN IS merely one email I send you – only one theme.
I have decided to try to hold people like you responsible for sins of omission and / commission under the generalised title of:
Only One Theme.
It will be readily understood that you are the first entry under this ‘Only One Theme’ theme.
Here it is Tom: you can of course respond in any way you wish. If you care to respond at all.
But you surely will not – because of your position in having become an UNREMITTING HUMBUG REMAINS.
You used to respond to my criticism – but no more! https://www.google.com.au/#q=geoff+seidner+tom
So here are the details that you may try to impeach.
Tom Elliott and 3.22pm Thursday 19 September 2014
You had a great caller who was allowed by you to say that Muslims are allowed to lie.
I do not do justice to this caller which must have bee=n around 3.20 pm. approx.
Then you took a call from an angry Muslim who claimed that there are three examples where Muslims are allowed to lie. He gave an example about lying to one’s wife to keep family peace.
[there was no femininist in sight... there must have been some girl - people / femininists angry at this – and other femininist issues resident in Islam... but not on your show...]
But you stood up for the girl people with your asinine ‘’does my bum look big in this dress’'?’’
Yes Tom – you even allowed him to refer to ‘’the real issue is Jewish terrorism’’
You barely remonstrated A LA: ‘’WHY DID YOU SAY THAT?’’
Well Tom – you then fielded a call from Michael a few minutes later... Michael who said:
‘’The World Trade Centre was not bombed by Jewish Terrorists.
Lakemba does not have Jews as third Columnists...’’
And this was your response Elliott to Michael:
‘’YES , WELL THE CALLER WAS PRETTY REASONABLE UNTIL THEN’’ !!!! [Ref to the Jewish terrorism bit]
Please feel free to respond – all this will be on my blog within minutes: you can respond any way you like. IF YOUR COWARDICE WILL ENABLE ‘’IT’’
*****Understand that sanction word is an antonym
past tense: sanctioned; past participle: sanctioned
Posted by Geoff Seidner at 11:17 am