The modus vivendi of this blog is plainly self explanatory. ........
From 2020 onwards I intend to attempt to use my blogs also as an adjunct and index of sorts for my Facebook efforts.............Structure being formulated......
My main other blogs are:
cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com......
mediaspinners.blogspot.com......
cognatemediaspinners.blogspot.com.......
gsscribbles.blogspot.com.........
Geoff Seidner
Of political cliches and friends - Wilders / Le Pen I read this morning in The Oz with some dismay; once again the sometimes useful political cliche ...The enemy of my enemy is my friend is simply trite!
Then the WSJ google search elicited this: WSJ EX MAY 23:National Front's Marine Le Pen of Fr. I recall how Wilders was and possibly remains in good standing amongst those with conservative / pro Israel values - basis the ancient political cliche as in WIKI and google on the Q society and Wilders! Oh dear - much remains to be explained! Note the role of ABC and the humiliation of Tony Jones by Wilders!
Tell me Jon – what happened between 8 35 am and 8 55
am?
You sounded almost reasonable early on – merely to lacerate
the PM within minutes by calling him a liar! Please explain how
such a moderate, careful, considered person who has legal training – could
become so .... inconsistent...??.... in such a narrow time span? Again – what
happened Jon?
Did you get a threatening tweet from the twits at twiterati –
world?
Did the hyphen threaten you?
You could get the police in Jon – just like those climate
scientists did a couple of years ago about their death – threats to climate
scientists at ANU. I am sure you could persuade the police to reinvestigate the
CC fraud / threat – and along the way encourage the Hyphenated Senator to behave
herself?
Look what Google has dug up, Jon: think how much more I could
find.
Think of how many of these I could dig up and ensure there is
a permanent record of you?
THE OZ 19/5/12: ABC 'climate death threats' reports
undermined. ABC 'climate death threats' reports undermined ....
threat. Posted by Geoff
Seidner at 11:17
pm.
May 3, 2012 - Subject: Climate
death threats fraudulent:
OFFICIAL! ... The AustralianClimate scientists' claims of email death threats go up in ... Geoff
Seidner
Feb 6, 2014 - My other
main blog: mediaspinners.blogspot.com.au Geoff Seidner ... Some items like alleged death threats against Climate scientists a year or
...
Aug 9, 2012 - Geoff Seidner ... productions canceled, books shelved by
publishers, thought-crime tribunals in Canada, death threats over political
cartoons.
Nov 24, 2012 - Climate Money Paper ...... Geoff, I think the
offending sprech by Newman was more recent. ...... Geoff Seidner .... death threats and racist remarks it likes as a part of the
“mandate” by the people by the “landslide” (under 1%
...
I do not wish to recapitulate from the above sources –
including my hurriedly – written earlier email. [ which has found it’s way to
my blog as you will appreciate.] i invite you to read it – remember that the
police refused to investigate fraud made up by your buddies who waste taxpayers
funds instead of doing something useful like inventing perpetual energy.
This email is also being posted on my blog virtually as soon
as Isend it to you: my readers await a reply so we can understand you better.
Aah – the wonders of being held to accound via technology....
I have always wanted to understand the left better – some
unkindly insist that the proletariat are indubitably wrong on everything they
espouse. this seems unkind.
Please help me to see your side of things. I beseech you –
take this opportunity to show you and the comrades can be correct in any fair
debate where words and corollaries count.
I do recommend you get a link to the ‘Bolt – Rowan Dean’
conversation from the Bolt Report.
I frequently listen to your programme and have grown adept at ignoring all
but your most outrageous anti conservative bias.
Sure, you have regular guests from the centre right – but sadly they are
mere masks and chimeras - a guise to hide the real YOU - o you will be able to
claim the obvious. that is the way of you people...
You see Jon – sometimes, regularly come to think of it – you slip
up.
I frequently listen to your programme and have grown adept at ignoring all
but your most outrageous anti conservative bias.
Sure, you have regular guests from the centre right – but sadly they are
mere masks and chimeras - a guise to hide the real YOU - o you will be able to
claim the obvious. that is the way of you people...
You see Jon – sometimes, regularly come to think of it – you slip
up.
BADLY – like yesterday morning 8 35 am to 9 am then I think 9 30
am approx.
You see Jon you demand that Abbott has perfect recall of
your visage at a brief moment in time!! Which he at the time he had no
reason to contemplate.
Lunatics like the hyphonated Senator and disparate comrades had
not at that time made a foray into this world of tripe.
All this is not only absurd – but contemptuous to any understanding of the
basics of common decent behaviour!
And having failed in this – you unhesitatingly call him a
LIAR!!!!!
PUHLEEEZ!!
How on any scale of reasonableness – how could you think in view of your 8
35 am comments... how could you let your guard so badly slip? By 8 55 am and
earlier...
WITHIN A FEW MINUTES YOU ACCUSE Tony Abbott .....of LYING!
You really think that the world should be a rational free zone – where
matters YOU admit to are ephemeral at 8 35 am ... you gainlessly , ignorantly
use to abuse the PM?
Shame on you: you let your guard down. What will the proletariat say?
OH – HOW ABOUT THIS MORNING?
Why JF: you should really admit that thanks to completely disproportinate
debate generated by fellow comrades – you allowed the leader of the opposition
at least 30 – 40 cliched tryped – up phrases? With ne’er a question to
95% of them, Shorten was abysmal: can you send me a transcript? i will pick at
least 40 discrete idiocies that you glibly allowed to sail past you in your
tranquil word of social justice.
It is so tempting to have further have a go at you for adopting THIS
MORNING the imbecilic analogous Labored line that there is no budget emergency
and that why can’t they do it over 10 years [ which is such an insult to the
colective’ intelligence]
10 YEARS JON? What organs, tools appendages and economic irrationalisms do
you hypothecate?
I see in front of me a somewhat sickish cartoon of a man falling from a
building – shouting ‘’STILL ALL RIGHT’
Tell me – where do you place Oz in 10 years of Abbott was to taken your
laissez faire line to yoor Labored friends’ disaster?
Yours Sincerely
Geoff Seidner
XXXXXXXXXXX
Much of the below is shorthand:
Subject matter: ABC RADIO
774
JON FAINE 8:30 a.m. To 9 a.m. Thursday
the 22nd of may
Jon Faine started his program saying
that it all was [essentially] much ado about nothing... with respect to Abbott
and the allegations that ....the claim that Abbott claimed with respect to
Faine smiling. The exact language matters not – the above is a correct
interpretation.
Note how he moved gradually from this reasonable position!
The transcript will be generous to me – these notes are a reconstruction
from my voice recording on my new Gallaxy 3.. which I am barely used to.
Very rapidly he started / had graduated
to this:
Faine started to attack Abbott’s office re above Abbott wink – claiming
that he MERELY RAISED HIS EYEBROWS AT THE SALIENT MOMENT!
AND AMAZINGLY to call ABBOTT A LIAR!!
A liar claiming that the scenario that
been had smiled at him was nothing more than a lie BECAUSE HE MERELY RAISED HIS
EYEBROW and that it was INEXCUSABLE!!
AND HERE IS THE ULTIMATE: a
caller at 9 54 am pointed out that there wasn't much difference between a smile
and a raised eyebrow, Faine merely said that ‘’you can put whatever
interpretation to it you like’’
OR ‘’ susceptible to interpretation’’???
HIS EXACT WORDS MATTER NOT – THIS IS AN ASTONISHING, ACCURATE
INDICTMENT OF JON FAINE WHO ON A GOOD DAY CLAIMS TO BE UNBIASED AGAINST TONY
ABBOTT AND THE LIBERAL GOVERNMENT!
I continue this matter with respect to FAINE and his conversation with the
incipient........ the incipient producer of the Insiders who discussed with same
the same scenario again!
They covered the same ground once again
in went into it once again ... FAINE
.... together with a ... female conducted the modern day derivation of the BIB
AND BUB SHOW AT 9 30 am approx.
Attention Foreign Minister / Deputy PM Julie
Bishop,
Attention Education Minister Christopher
Pyne
Attorney General George Brandis,
And my local Member Michael Danby
Julie Bishop and Gentlemen,
I draw your attention to a range of articles in today’s The Oz and
others per links here under.
I wish to draw your attention that the boycotts against Jews and
Israel – secondary or otherwise are probably illegal. CERTAINLY RACIST.
Certainly humbug as well.
Furthermore these entities are wasting government funds in using
YOUR / OUR resources for outrageous politicking – instead of furthering the
indubitable interests of our youth.
No wonder university research has such a bad name that universities
are reduced to begging the public... funding / research / etc as you can see in
the papers. They ruin the HES policy.. no time for more..
And worse – Mr Brandis should immediately warn them – as Julia
Bishop has done. Indeed perhaps Mr Brandis has probably done as well – that not
only are they acting in a way that is immoral, and arguably illegal
– but they risk being declared personae non –
grata. A new word
methinks?
Oh – and if morality or it’s obverse does not move them – then let
there be the law that could declare them an undesirable organisation in a
similar league to terrorists. INDEED THEY SUPPORT TERRORIST – SO WHY NOT DECLARE
THEM NEFARIOUS?
And if that does not do ‘it’ – then let them be crippled / starved
of funds in their peace and conflated studies. [this is no
typo]
AMAZING, INEXPLICABLE RE BDS
TODAY!
Any careful reading of merely these documents elicits
more questions than answers.
MORE than 40 members of the federal
opposition banded together yesterday to sign the London Declaration on Combating
Anti-Semitism after they were incensed by comments from the head of the Sydney
Peace Foundation, Stuart Rees, attacking the
document.
The
Australian yesterday reported Professor Rees had lashed Julia Gillard for
signing the declaration, calling the gesture "childish, thoughtless but easily
populist".
Professor Rees is on the staff of the university's Centre for
Peace and Conflict Studies - which supports the Boycott, Divestment and
Sanctions movement that explicitly equates Israel with apartheid-era South
Africa.
The Prime
Minister last month became the first Australian politician to sign the
declaration.
She was
joined last week by opposition frontbencher Christopher
Pyne.
Professor
Rees dismissed their action in emails obtained by The Australian as "childish,
thoughtless, but easily populist".
I write
to voice shock at the outrages and manifest anti – Israel bias of The
Australian’s Middle East correspondent, John Lyons .
Reference is made to page 8 of The Oz on Saturday May 10 2014.
Lyons uses his contacts relating to his multi – discredited recent ABC /
Lyons4
Corners abomination!
I note
that Lyons has now introduced Australian Senator Nick Xenophon to Lyon’s
buddies ex the above programme; what a
list! And the
below are merely the ones the writer admits
to.
Breaking The Silence
B’’Tselem
Barister Gerard Horton.
Military Court Watch
UNICEF
International Court of
Justice.
It is
the contrived / self – censored photograph that gets to me: Lyons is good at the
setting up of fraudulent set pieces like the
hysterical Palestinian woman in a
cage.
My
files are replete with similar fraud. IT IS NOT THE FIRST TIME THE AUSTRALIAN
TOOK DOWN THE ON - LINE VERSION OF
LYONS’ ANTI – ISRAEL CONFECTIONS: THEREADER WILL HAVE TO LOOK AT THE HARD COPY OF THE OZ [PAGE
8]
TO
SEE THE UN EDITED PHOTO.
And
look who has fallen for all this? Why it is the oh - so – respected Senator Nick
Xenophon who clearly refuses to open his other
eye!
The
good senator has essentially admitted that he saw no one other than JL’s
cronies.
‘’He was briefed by Australian barrister Gerard
Hortonfrom Military Court Watch about a Unicef report that
found ill treatment
of Palestinian children appeared
to
be “widespread, systematic and institutionalized”. Mr
Horton said MCW had found that since the report there had been
some
improvements but 90 per cent of
detained children were still
tied
and 55 per cent reported physical
abuse.’’
Just
how many times are these travesties; not just lies and distortions – but
inversions of victimhood going to recur?
Without
the remotest suggestion that Rupert Murdoch will intervene? Does the current
editor think that the wonderful efforts of other journalists re the BDS offsets
the Lyons entity?
I
reckon the word Pilgerized should be joined by an appropriate JL
aphorism.
There
are dozens of matters in merely the current article: mendacities that the
informed reader will be able discern.
What
concerns is that there are plenty of ill – informed people in this wonderful
country of ours who are regularly fed anti – Israel
tripe
through
the tools, appendages and acolytes of probably the only real – live enemy at The
Oz of tiny Israel - the only democracy in
the area.
Thus evil thrives!
Sometimes
one feels there is no morality extant anymore.
Post
modernism and the refusal for decent people to rail against true injustice – I
reckon today Richard Nixon would have
survived Watergate – no one would have cared – or had the
attention span....
No wonder people many people have little interest in politics and less appreciation for the arcane arts of broad humbug via politicians. Why - even journalists are guilty of bringing democratic processes into disrepute.
Take the current issue de jour - the government's proposed repeal of section 18C of the Human Rights Act.
Most of the players trying to defend the proposal via the 'Freedom Of Expression' perspective have deliberately distorted the issues lest they concede to those who disagree with them. Arguably this is the way of politics. it has always been so.
But worse; try reading editorials, articles and letters espousing ''sacrifices in the pursuit of freedom and free speech'' published in The Australian for example on merely Tuesday 6/5. Such grandiose verbiage.
Remember the infamous quote:
And The Oz not for the first time, continues the ignoble loosing fight in the editorial of 6/5.
Indeed - it has been obvious for a good while that they will have to get used to 18C; it will remain more or less as is.
THE GREAT WARREN MUNDINE
Note Warren Mundine wrote on April 1 in The Australian.
''As it happens, under the new laws people can incite hatred against Jewish people while participating in public discussion of a wide range of subjects. Holocaust deniers will have a wide berth to peddle their misinformation. Evidently, the drafters didn’t manage to find a form of words that would allow Bolt’s comments on the one hand but prevent public hate speech on the other.''
The key is the last sentence. So much rubbish has elsewhere been promoting the idea that freedom of speech trumps the responsibility for same! Why have we seen three letters from The League of Rights promoting unilateral freedom?
Will the next debate be the above or whether the Nazis should have finished the job? The new Thin edge of the wedge? Who would have believed a mere few years ago that Jews would be attacked in the streets?
Mundine was unfairly lacerated by a professor of law a few days later. A travesty.
Nor, in Australia, has the controversial Section 18C of the RDA prevented a 21 per cent increase in the number of reports of racist violence directed at individuals or Jewish facilities in the past year. That disturbing trend is a good reason for open debate and the airing of grievances, to allow them to be dealt with by rational, sensible argument.''t GS: THERE ARE AT LEAST TWO OBSCENITIES HERE ABOVE: SURELY
ANYONE CAN SEE THEM??? Note that Jews are now encouraged to believe that being attacked requires them to accept that it is their fault, we should debate it with criminals - and LO! Even the 18C is being blamed for not preventing the attacks!
And on 30/4 the editorial of the Oz wrote:
''Unfortunately for Jewish Australians who hold a multiplicity of views, the main organisations dedicated to the defense of Israel, the Middle East’s only functioning democracy, have taken a narrow approach. On its website, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, published a rebuttal to Professor Dershowitz’s Wednesday article. The rebuttal, by Peter Wertheim, said all the peak Jewish national bodies in Australia were united in opposition to plans to alter the RDA. Their stand, paradoxically, is in line with many of Israel’s most trenchant critics from the left of the Australian media.
Some within the Jewish diaspora disagree with the organisations’ official line. Such individuals know that majority or official opinion among any group is not necessarily always right. Many racial and religious groups, including Jews, have learned, that lesson at vast and painful cost through history. Free choice, including opposition to cultural coercion, was one of the 10 founding principles of Israel, which is also a good reason for respecting dissenting views.''
Anyone should be able to see that those troublesome creatures have no rights
To majority opinion [''majority are ''not necessarily right'']
Free choice.. but some have been guilty of ''cultural coercion''!
The what about breaking ''the founding principles of Israel?
These are virtually blood libels!
RECONFIGURING BIGOTRY - IT IS NOT JUST BRANDIS' FAULT The reconfiguring of bigotry via the comment from George Brandis was irresponsible. I think he realizes it now.
No they do not, Mr Brandis! Because in front of our eyes we already have the long silent 'League' gleefully claiming glory by their publications in mainstream media. Writers have also shifted the arena by claiming that we can defend ourselves in a debate.
Oh the dozens of cliched twirpery in disparate articles insisting the that there exists a ''marketplace of ideas''
that will not skew t
Is that all there is to it?
The reader should note that the mid point has already shifted.
MID POINT AND OTHER OBSCENITIES
But - to set a new mid - point - ANY debating point of debate for the greatest tragedy / mass - murder in history, is unspeakable!
This mid point is as follows. Yad Vashem is still struggling to find the names of the 6 million who perished. So, is there anyone who wishes to debate that there were only 5,950,000 Jews murdered?
Is the mid point agreed to be agreed to - to be 5, 975,000?
AND in the act of debating the holocaust - THAT is exactly what happens!
An inevitable by - product of allowing this will indubitably, invariably set up the very idea that the fact of the matter is debatable! I suggest that there has never been a greater obscenity than this newly - created 'mid - point' in vulgarism.
This mid point is as follows. Yad Vashem is still struggling to find the names of the 6 million who perished. So, is there anyone who wishes to espouse there were only 5,950,000 Jews murdered?
Is the mid point agreed to as 5, 975,000?
Or will the next debate be the above or whether the Nazis should have finished the job?
Heck NO! I withdraw this corollary - this mere cliche - in the sense that it will never come to that, never.
Surely there will always be decent people who will never allow it to descend to hypothesizing about how Hitler could have murdered 10 million? Then there would be no - one to have written this. But the twirps could debate what a victorious Hitler would have done?
May be those same cavalier people who today ignorantly espouse freedom of speech for incipient defacto Nazis on the AXIS of the contextually - untenable 'freedom' of speech moniker, should become aware what the ill - thought consequences will be. It is essentially decreptitudinous and dastardly.
THE AUSTRALIAN AND THE LEAGUE OF RIGHTS
Oh - I make this comment_ people should be wary of getting into proverbial bed with the League of Rights: The Australian has published 3 letters in the last few weeks to the editor by these entities. Beware ye all!
And The Australian has been disgraceful in all ways!
I do a partial cut and paste from their astonishing editorial from early April as here.
Amity, a word which means "friendship", can refer to: Look up amity in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. Contents. 1 Places in the United States; 2 Education ...
enmity
ˈɛnmɪti/
noun
noun: enmity; plural noun: enmities
a state or feeling of active opposition or hostility.
