The modus vivendi of this blog is plainly self explanatory. Pathetically,'progressives' regularly promote implausable, impractical or plainly asinine ideas. Who but socialists could for decades abuse the term 'economic rationalism' - without humiliation? THIS GOES TO THE VERY HEART OF ECONOMIC POLICY AND RATIONAL GOVERNMENT: TO WIT TO NOT CRITICIZE THE CONSERVATIVES AS BEING 'RATIONAL'!
My other main blog:
Once again you Neil Mitchell are ensconced in being nice to
This morning you were discussing the idea floated by some of
forcing some of the worst murderers to disclose what they did with
the bodies of children – so the families had at least that much to live
Not according to you, Neil Mitchell!
Oh – you used your favourite cliched excuse: ‘’we are much
better than them.’’
You have used this mealy – mouthed justification in sooooo
many leftist ways – in sooooo many realms.
The death penalty
Even Anita Coby’s murderers, the Russell St monsters, rapist –
murderers of little children, Nazi monsters – no, you would even protect
Hitler’s life under the aegis that WE are too good for that!
Speak for yourself! I OBJECT TO YOUR ‘’WE’’
DO YOU KNOW HOW THEY RAPED AND DROWNED ANITA
According to you – murdering 6 million of my brethren –
including my toddler aunt Veronka Scheffer – does not warrant the meagre price
SURELY THIS IS CLOSE TO SUGGESTING THAT THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTE
VALUES THAT JUSTIFIES HOLDING A PERSON RESPONSIBLE VIA THE PERCEIVED VALUES /
MORALITY OF DENYING THEM THE RIGHT TO LIVE! THIS IS ALL PATHETICALLY CLOSE TO
SUGGESTING THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTE VALUES .....!
Michael Stanley Dukakis (/dʉˈkɑːkɨs/; born
November 3, 1933; Greek: .... of the debate, asked Dukakis, "Governor, if Kitty Dukakis [his wife] were raped and ... and I think you know that I've opposed the
death penalty during all of my life", ...
COULD YOU FORGIVE THE NAZI ON HIS DEATHBED!?? I have
seen a great essay on this – and may get permission to post it on my
ANSWER IT NM!!
You see Neil Mitchell – if Irving on his tour around the world
– which would have included Australia if the Government had not banned him – had
said that Hitler did not kill enough Jews – instead of his obscene refrain in
denying the holocaust – you would have debated this with him!
YOU would have put into the public domain – even THIS
derivative of his many obscenities! YOU DO NOT GET IT MITCHELL: BY DEBATING
MATTERS YOU IMPLY – NAY EXPRESS – THAT THERE IS A DEBATING POINT TO BE PROFERED
IN THE MEDIA!!!
THIS IS SICK!!
‘’We are too good ‘’ to deny freedom of speech – no matter the
AND THAT IS THE ULTIMATE INDICTMENT OF YOUR PERSON – THERE ARE
NO IMMORALITIES THAT YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO INDICT VIA THE ONLY SANCTION THAT IS
EVEN REMOTELY PROPORTIONAL!
YOU ACCUSED JEWS OF THE ULTIMATE OBSCENITY IN OCT 2000 EX THE
INTIFADA- NE’ER an APOLOGY FROM THE WE ARE TOO GOOD ENTITY!!
AND of course you have been too scared to put me on the air
since I took you to the ABA.
In due course I will put it all on my blog: it still will not
elicit a response from you!