Friday, 21 November 2014

Second email to M Danby pasted here

From: g87
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 1:42 PM
Subject: Copy again to Paul Murray so Paul M can perhaps pass on to G Richardson

Copy to Paul Murray so Paul can perhaps pass on to G Richardson – who refuses to divulge his email!
Dear Michael Danby
This email will also be on my blog in seconds – allowing any of the troika below to serve notices or respond?
****
I write earlier because previous email / blog was written too quickly.
I put to you Michael Danby that you must have known that the modus for Graham  Richardson’s classical / hypocritical ‘even – handed approach’**** in inviting the esteemed Greg Sheridan to discuss Carr’s earlier outrageous commentary  included the obvious. That Greg Sheridan was unable to meaningfully comment on Bob Carr, due to Richardson asking him about ISIS and Putin initially.This dramatically reduced Sheridan’s time even further.
This was so obvious.
I put to you Michael Danby that GR constantly talked - over Sheridan. [during the minute or so that Sheridan was allowed re Israel and Carr]
I put to you Michael Danby that GR deliberately allowed Sheridan a mere 60 secs – entirely interrupted with GR’s hopelessly empty or deliberately vacuous  interruptions.
I put to you Michael Danby that  perhaps there were conditions put by Richardson that may explain your pathetic performance. Either that or you are simply more stupid than I thought.
Intelligent people will tell you MD that the simplest solution is the best: you are not that stupid!
After all, manifestly your troika are comrades. All members of the right of the extreme – left faction? And faction is everything amongst socialists, non?
What else could explicate what you did? OR FAILED TO DO! Simply you are  all members of the right of the extreme – left faction: explain it otherwise.
Note that I am aware that you have written excellent articles attacking Carr: but you have never before so manifestly compromised yourself by so obviously allowing R or anyone else to dictate matters to you – and destroy so comprehensively your reputation.
Tell me Michael D: have you never heard of any of  the classical tools of political debate / interview?
To wit: ‘the real question Richo is why did you so compromise yourself in giving such a soft interview to Carr?
To wit: ‘the real question Richo – why did you set such outrageous conditions for my interview with you? J’ACCUSE DANBY!
To wit: ‘the real question Richo – why am I being forced to ask this asinity: ‘’YOU WERE RIGHT RICHO IN YOUR CONVERSATION WITH BOB CARR: THAT THE MIDDLE EAST IS CRUMBLING’’
Note carefully that this is what should  say the real Michael Danby – as hereunder:
‘Richo if I looked at your lamentable interview of his BOBNESS CARR, your comment was that [merely] ‘’IRAQ IS A MESS’’
Why did you essentially force me to ‘agree’ with you that the ME is crumbling’ – and thus somehow, glean merit for your pathetic interview of Carr?
So you are eliciting in this most pathetically outrageous way for me to agree – or seemingly partly agree with you  if only to the shallow  extent that I [MD] is going to be seen by the socialist twirps.
Why force me - via this asinine convolution,  that I, MD actually agree with you Richo ex your Carr interview?! Not even the tomato left faction would swallow that, Richo.
Of course the above is ethereal fiction – because like the troika – none of you is a ‘mentsch’
Indeed you are all unreconstructed humbugs of the socialist kind that vitiates the neurons you were born with. Oops – someone could reasonably suggest that people are born with a political persuasion.....
I partially repeat yesterday’s hurriedly – written diatribe in this more substantial diatribe.
How could you not spend more than 11 secs on the murder of Jews – and in the process make asinine jokes about Shorten’s ratings.
You are lucky I have no time for even a basic analysis!
How could you not mention to R that he was guilty of the worst of interviews?
How could you not ask R why he allowed Julia Gillard to be depicted - see above link - as being strangled by the Jewish lobby with Parliament house burning in the background?
AS PART OF AN ARTICLE  RICHARDSON WROTE!!!!
FOLLOW THE LINKS AND LEARN HOW TO BE A MENTSCH, MICHAEL DANBY!!!
Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Gr
East St Kilda 3183
03 9525 9299

  • Socialist Dystopia: 9/3/14- ODE TO R MURDOCH.. great ...

    socialistdystopia.blogspot.com/2014/.../9314-ode-to-r-murdoch-great.ht...
    Mar 10, 2014 - So I guess quoting a self - hating Jew makes it 'alright.' ... with the cartoon depictingJulia Gillard as being strangled by the Jewish Lobby ...
  • Socialist Dystopia: A formal complaint against The Oz ...

    socialistdystopia.blogspot.com/.../a-formal-complaint-against-oz-repeate...
    Mar 28, 2013 - IT IS SICK TO DEPICT JULIA GILLARD AS BEING STRANGLED BY THE JEWISH LOBBY! WHAT SAY YE – RUPERT MURDOWSKI?? You are ...
    You've visited this page 2 times. Last visit: 28/08/14
  • Socialist Dystopia: Press Council response of sorts

    socialistdystopia.blogspot.com/2013/04/press-council-response-of-sorts.html
    Apr 15, 2013 - I almost agreed – even though it is difficult to see how the cartoon ofJulia Gillard being strangled by the Jewish Lobby AKA Star Of David – and ...

    EX YESTERDAY’S POST ON MY SOCIALYST DYSTOPIA BLOG:
    ‘’How could you be so inept as to claim that ‘’you were right Graham when you said last week with Bob that the Middle East is crumbling.’’
    Really?
    IS THAT WHAT YOU REALLY SAID – because that is at best shallow and stupid and absurdly contradictable via Israel, non? You said as much later!’’
  • No comments:

    Post a Comment