SEIDNER WRITES RUBBISH: SEE NEXT
LINK HEREUNDER:
http://socialistdystopia.blogspot.com.au/2015/01/seidner-writes-rubbish-see-previous.html
########################################
########################################
RELATED LINKS:
▼ December (6)
- THE OZ Letters 30 Dec 2014
- Revamped Hadron Collider targets mysteries of univ...
- SCIENCE TURNS TO GOD AS UNIVERSE APPEARS TO BE ULT...
- links to lamentable higgs boson - somehow it won a...
From: g87
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:49 AM
To: the australian
Subject: Self - contradictory humbug
A CLASSICAL CHIMERA OF ATHEISTS
Paul Yates plays the eternal self – contradictory mere word - game of
deluded atheists. [Logical fallacy on God 30/12 Letters]
I do not understand why he refused to use any of Eric Metaxas dozens of
near – infinity phrases: preferring instead to create his own in
‘’vanishingly small set of realities.’’
Obviously he has a problem with ‘’realities.’’ He guiltlessly abuses the
term.
Worse: Yates has a conscientious objection to numbers which he thus tries
to hide via word games. And sadly his non - elegant dance merely more clearly
illustrates it to those who are not shamelessly wilfully blind.
How inelegant this defacto concession of the irreducibly - insane
idea of a million monkeys typing hypothesis. And and yet it moves his mind
into the stasis of trying denying the impossibly – small numbers he earlier
conceded.
It must be a necessary ameliorative appendage; a penchant for creating
impossible self – made problems.
And more important, he must think the erudite reader fails to see the
following.
- Given the above virtual concession re ‘realities’ – he attempts a snow job via his miss use of that eternally abused ‘begging the question’ phrase.
- Lines later Yates amazingly postulates that these self – same ‘’vanishingly small set of realities’’ can in fact ‘’exist entirely by chance...’’
- And reinforces the manifest contradiction it when he finishes with ‘’The possibility that life in some form could exist elsewhere is real, and is worth exploring.’’
So I verily say
to ye, o aesthetically atheistic one: be careful what you write - someone is
going to hold you to account.
The world is not
completely held in thrall to you post – modernists.
Geoff
Seidner
13 Alston Gr
East St Kilda
3183
03 9 525
9299
Why Richard Dawkins' typing monkey theorem is a load of ...
And yet it moves - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
-
Begging the question - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question - ####################################################################
- Supplementary Links
- http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/jewsevolution.html
- http://www.myjewishlearning.com/beliefs/Issues/Science/Creationism_and_Evolution.shtml
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Schroeder
No comments:
Post a Comment