Tuesday 30 December 2014

A CLASSICAL CHIMERA OF ATHEISTS



SEIDNER WRITES RUBBISH: SEE NEXT


 LINK   HEREUNDER:



http://socialistdystopia.blogspot.com.au/2015/01/seidner-writes-rubbish-see-previous.html




########################################

########################################




RELATED LINKS:

▼  December (6)

From: g87
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:49 AM
Subject: Self - contradictory humbug
A CLASSICAL CHIMERA OF ATHEISTS
Paul Yates plays the eternal self – contradictory mere word -  game of deluded atheists. [Logical fallacy on God 30/12 Letters]
I do not understand why he refused to use any of Eric Metaxas dozens of near – infinity phrases: preferring  instead to create his own in ‘’vanishingly small set of realities.’’
Obviously he has a problem with ‘’realities.’’ He guiltlessly abuses the term.
Worse: Yates has a conscientious objection to numbers which he thus tries to hide via word games. And sadly his non - elegant dance merely more clearly illustrates it to those who are not shamelessly wilfully blind.
How inelegant this defacto concession of the irreducibly - insane idea of a million monkeys typing hypothesis. And and yet it moves  his mind into the stasis of trying denying the impossibly – small numbers he earlier conceded.
It must be a necessary ameliorative appendage; a penchant for creating impossible self – made problems.
And more important, he must think the erudite reader fails to see the following.
  1. Given the above virtual concession re ‘realities’ – he attempts a snow job via his miss use of that eternally abused ‘begging the question’ phrase.
  2. Lines later Yates amazingly postulates that these self – same  ‘’vanishingly small set of realities’’ can in fact ‘’exist entirely by chance...’’
  3. And reinforces the manifest contradiction it when he finishes with ‘The possibility that life in some form could exist elsewhere is real, and is worth exploring.’’
So I verily say to ye, o aesthetically atheistic one: be careful what you write -  someone is going to hold you to account.
The world is not completely held in thrall to you post – modernists.
Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Gr
East St Kilda 3183
03 9 525 9299

Why Richard Dawkins' typing monkey theorem is a load of ...

And yet it moves - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. Begging the question means "assuming the conclusion (of an argument)", a type of circular reasoning. This is an informal fallacy where the conclusion that one is attempting to prove is included in the initial premises of an argument, often in an indirect way that conceals this fact.
  2. Begging the question - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question
    https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/begging-the-question
  3. ####################################################################
  4. Supplementary Links
  5. http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/jewsevolution.html
  6. http://www.myjewishlearning.com/beliefs/Issues/Science/Creationism_and_Evolution.shtml
  7. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Schroeder



No comments:

Post a Comment