Monday 16 February 2015

Shalom again, Zephania Wachs

From: g87
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 1:24 PM
Subject: Shalom again, Zephania Wachs

Shalom again, Zephania Wachs
Have I got a conspiracy for you!
It is truly a great one – if at least to the extent that you may not be able to discern where the parody begins and the conspiracy ends.
Awesome, non?
Nothing like the denial of the moon landing or derivations of JFK conspiracy – nor from this classicist warehouse: https://www.google.com.au/#q=muslim+conspiracies
And it gets better, Zephania.
This has a real purpose.
Herein I proffer my very best legal advice. Free of charge – but invaluable it is thought by my friends.
Let me tell you about parodies and conspiracy theories. This way you may be able to understand my actual message to you frere et fil.
Zephania!
Be warned that almost all of this ilk – conspiracy AKA  parody AKA legal advice AKA any hidden messages – are over the top by big margins.
It is unprecedented to have 4 in one as here.
Zephania!
This postulate is not purposeless nor implausable – nor requires a reconstruction of realities...
I know you are still reading this simply to hunt for what you really think wil;l be potentally actionable material herein.
I dunno – I wrote earlier that I am going to be helpful with defacto legal advice.
You have been patient. So here it is in some sort of logical sequence.
I put to you that Rabbi Kluwgant deliberately sent that text message with those possibly arguably poorly chosen words. Or – were these words ‘poorly – chosen?
He knew that the editor of The Jewish News would not be able to resist the temptation of sending it on to your solicitor – who in turn would not be able to resist the temptation of using it to embarrass Rabbi Kluwgant with a GOTCHA within the Royal Commission.
It gets better.
Rabbi Kluwgant knew he would be lacerated in the community – further ensuring there would be a noisy story. Can you better describe what may happen? Surely – even the word ‘lunatic’ is pure genius.
It is a mere rhetorical flourish – and merely looks actionable. AAH ... it must have seemed like a very good idea to your girl solicitor to attack the Rabbi.
Who knows – it may still be a cute diversion in future times. But here is the problem Zephania – or merely one problem Zephania.
Are you and Manny really prepared for what may follow?
Depending on the unforseen of course.
Did you really tell the girl – person everything?
Everything? Really?
Does she really understand everything?
You may have noticed that it is likely that the parody / conspiracy / legal advice is at an end.
But I have a few questions that you may be uncomfortable in answering.
  1. How much of your son’s blog did you feel you could respond to and or deny if you so self – servingly refused to address ANY part or debunk a mere phrase? I notice the comments of the owner of DAAS HATORAH who is on good terms with you. Here was an opportunity Zephania. Surely it was incumbent on you to respond even in a minor way? Surely you realize that your refusal indicts you?
  2. AND THE SCENARIO THAT YOU SEE NO PURPOSE IS LEGAL HUMBUG!
  3. And of course – this refusal has been over many, many months! Every day it looses you pair significant credibility to not respond to anything therein and ALL ELSEWHERE!
  4. And my own humble blogs as well. this email will be on my blog within a minute: you may care / deign to respond on my blog or via this email?
  5. OH_ when did you create this CHABAD – BASED EMAIL INCORPORATING 770?
  6. Manny’s son was sent to Yeshivah 5 years ago! HUH? How terrible a place.....
  7. What happened since the last 5 years to elicit a change???
  8. I hope Rabbi Glick sues you: your apology may mean far less than the genuine apology and change of culture as per Rabbi Smukler’s evidence at the denouement of the Royal Commission.
I do not think that this email should continue with more or a didactic analysis – which I really do not intend to be genuine legal advice to you or Manny.
It is not seriously expected that the girl person would allow me to give you advice anyway.
But I tell you Zephania – may Hashem not test you with real tragedies like what happened to my wife and myself.
May you never know to be really tested as to the basic elements of style and mentschlechkeit!
You should carefully consider what you have done: and surely be ashamed of yourself / yourselves.
Geoff Seidner
####################################################
From: g87
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 10:38 AM
Subject: Shalom Zephania Wachs
Shalom Zephania Wachs
I note that you and your son Manny made a series of grave errors in primarily, initially not informing your lawyer Melinda Richards that it really  is / was / would not be /  good idea to put the matters of the AJN text messages into play.
You people should have informed SC Richards what is / WAS really going on within your family. Perhaps the dear lady would not have thought it was such ‘a good idea at the time.’
But that is not for me to speculate: all the frolics the dear lady went on in over – cooking matters is a matter of public record. It is indeed not possible to contemplate whether she would have mentioned Rabbi Kluwgant’s text messages.
Maybe Rabbi Kluwgant was not at his best with his choice of words. It matters not. They are not actionable by you no matter how you ot Manny spin it.
Sadly for you – it was a dramatic own – goal.
Sadly the dear lady was badly off – side: end of my sporting analogies. I have problems with the offside rule: it is about as silly as some people.
I am saddened that you have not objected to any of my writings – it is the minimalist modus that should have been done.
Instead you shut down matters as below
Sigh.
No time for more: however I hope to give your solicitors or yourself legal advise if you want it.
Kol tov
Geoff Seidner
Hey Zephania: note your multiple excuses for not commenting:
‘’...not serve any useful purpose to publicly reply and discuss the accusations’’
Tell me Zephania – why not respond or try to deny any or all of the comments of your own flesh and blood?
Are you not aware of the humbug also of your asinine, multi – repeated classisist demonising of ‘bloggers’?
Are you not understanding that the very idea is risible if it was not so pathetic?

Tuesday, 11 December 2012

WAKS: what did he not know – and when did he not know it?


################################################################################################################################################
From: g87
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 10:47 AM
Subject: WAKS: what did he not know – and when did he not know it?
WAKS: what did he not know – and when did he
 not know it?
Re The Australian Council 'downplaying Yeshiva abuse scandal' 
 11/12
It is a bit rich for Manny Waks to claim cover ups existed at the
 ECAJ before and after his term/ s as Vice President.
The eternal inverted question is what did he not know – and
 when did he not know it?
But let us say for the sake of over – generosity that this is so: 
that he became aware of all the multifarious cover ups at all
 levels of seemingly all Jewish organizations. All over Australia. 
And decided to spill it all only now.
It is understood he was a victim himself years before, becoming
 a very voluble advocate of his inarguably meritorious cause of 
uncovering sexual abuse of children.
There have indeed been attempts at cover – ups. Sadly, it was
 the reaction in earlier times to dealing with the problem!
The Church dwarfing the Jewish community thousands – fold. 
Not that it ameliorates anything!
So my questions herein continue:
  1. How successful has anyone been in silencing him? Is this not absurd?
  2. Why did he wait so long with these latest accusations /revelations?
  3. If there was a cover up it would surely not come from the ECAJ! This is just common sense. 
  4. It requires no great hypothesis.
  5. Is this not an absurd proposition to suggest that this professional media person has been   
  6.  silenced?
  7. Furthermore – why does he feel obliged to exaggerate?
  8. He plainly discredits himself – he should not so taint his cause.
Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Grove
East St Kilda 3183
03 9525 9299
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)