- How much of your son’s blog did you feel you could respond to and or deny if you so self – servingly refused to address ANY part or debunk a mere phrase? I notice the comments of the owner of DAAS HATORAH who is on good terms with you. Here was an opportunity Zephania. Surely it was incumbent on you to respond even in a minor way? Surely you realize that your refusal indicts you?
- AND THE SCENARIO THAT YOU SEE NO PURPOSE IS LEGAL HUMBUG!
- And of course – this refusal has been over many, many months! Every day it looses you pair significant credibility to not respond to anything therein and ALL ELSEWHERE!
- And my own humble blogs as well. this email will be on my blog within a minute: you may care / deign to respond on my blog or via this email?
- OH_ when did you create this CHABAD – BASED EMAIL INCORPORATING 770?
- Manny’s son was sent to Yeshivah 5 years ago! HUH? How terrible a place.....
- What happened since the last 5 years to elicit a change???
- I hope Rabbi Glick sues you: your apology may mean far less than the genuine apology and change of culture as per Rabbi Smukler’s evidence at the denouement of the Royal Commission.
Tuesday, 11 December 2012
WAKS: what did he not know – and when did he not know it?
not know it?
ECAJ before and after his term/ s as Vice President.
when did he not know it?
that he became aware of all the multifarious cover ups at all
levels of seemingly all Jewish organizations. All over Australia.
And decided to spill it all only now.
a very voluble advocate of his inarguably meritorious cause of
uncovering sexual abuse of children.
the reaction in earlier times to dealing with the problem!
Not that it ameliorates anything!
- How successful has anyone been in silencing him? Is this not absurd?
- Why did he wait so long with these latest accusations /revelations?
- If there was a cover up it would surely not come from the ECAJ! This is just common sense.
- It requires no great hypothesis.
- Is this not an absurd proposition to suggest that this professional media person has been
- Furthermore – why does he feel obliged to exaggerate?
- He plainly discredits himself – he should not so taint his cause.