Media enquiries
Media
Communications
Telephone: +61 3 9903 4840
Email: media@monash.edu
Telephone: +61 3 9903 4840
Email: media@monash.edu
Dear Courtney
Per our very brief conversation mid morning –
Kindly pass this epistle on to Prof. Michael
Asten as below.
Dear Professor,
I read your article with
interest.
There are many questions arising out
of the first half of said article.
-
Mohamed Nasheed has many times recently begged for Western aid re their ‘climate catastrophes’ his country is allegedly suffering, yet The Maldives has the greatest number of 5 – Star motels per head of population than any other country. I saw it all in a travelogue on Foxtel months ago....
-
Yet you say he has ‘’..added to the debate’’ Exactly what has he added? Other than hysteria?
-
Maurice Newman – as per your article- has claimed that it is all ‘’scientific delusion.’’ He is right – thanks to self – promoting people at least...
-
Your own 5 points are strange – and that is elicited merely from your own words: one day someone will hold you to account.
But my interest is that it is all
plain silly....the maths are out by
thousands of per cent!
Do you now see this? Why not? It is
mere uncommon common sense professor.
Put it another way. Professor: your
figures are so self – contradictory AND so deliberately constructed and invented
- as to be an insult to your research!! And all is apparent via the common
sense route that you leftists abandoned decades ago.
TO WIT – YOU MESSED UP BIG TIME! Per
your ‘unhide’ - able incompetence.
Put it another way; no one should
have even in their most delusional dream have been so utterly contemptuous of
the basic elements of basic truth in research, so as to be allowing himself to
be ‘abomenated’ without any basic research indictment needed on my
part!
YOU have done this to yourself. All
by yourself.
Worse, Professor, the last half is ‘chock –
full’ of idiocies. Say for example – give me the data for sea level measurements
for the last 200 years? How can you claim that the religion of climate lunacy
existed 200 years ago – which would have required these ancient people to
measure micro – millimetres of surely no interest to them?
Can you show me who researched the green
house effect – global warming AKA Climate lunacy 200 years ago?
PUHLEEZ!
Never mind the next few lines – which
AMAZINGLY YOU DECIMATE THE CC SCIENCE YOURSELF!!
Yes!
You admit the fraud!!
At this time I would like also to know
why the mega – moron Michael Mann – he the twirp who invented the fraud of the
HOCKEY STICK TEMPS – WAS ALLOWED TO INVENT THE LUNATIC PHRASE ‘’multi-decadal cyclic variations in
global sea level.’’??
Your response is eagerly awaited: CAN YOU GET THE BOM to reply in
unison?
By the way: you are a professor of apparent standing: how did you manage
it?
Regards
Geoff Seidner
East St Kilda
##########################
| Atlantic Multi-Decadal Oscillation |
|
Definition: (Aka AMO) A multi-decadal (e.g., 65 to 75 year) fluctuation in the North
Atlantic during which sea surface temperatures showed:
(1) warm phases during (roughly) 1860-1880 and 1930-1960 and (2) cool phases during 1905-1925 and 1970-1990 with a range of order 0.4°C. Notes: 1. According to Michael Mann, the term was coined by Michael Mann: "I coined the term in an interview with Richard Kerr [a writer for Science] in 2000 about a paper he did with Tom Delworth of the GFDL and the NOAA Laboratory in Princeton, where we actually were the ones to articulate the existence of this oscillation. And you know what? It was celebrated by contrarians. My work has been celebrated by climate skeptics. It's an interesting footnote." |
######################################################
‘’A useful
baseline number for global sea-level rise is a mean of 1.7mm a year for the
period 1900-2010. Faster rates of rise in the order of 3.2 mm a year are
recorded for 1993-2010, and 1930-1950. Projections of sea-level rise of 90cm by
the year 2100 - used to justify planning restrictions on coastal property -
require the rate of rise to increase to 15mm a year.
While the
evidence for a small underlying trend of an increasing sea level is compelling,
faster rates of rise and projections based on these need to be reconsidered in
the light of evidence of multi-decadal cyclic variations in global sea
level.’’
A useful
???baseline??? number for global sea-level rise is a mean??? of 1.7mm a
year for the period 1900-2010. COMPARE WITH BELOW SELF –PROMOTED 100
YEAR TIME ,,,,Faster rates ????of rise in the order of 3.2 mm a year??? are
recorded for 1993-2010, and 1930-1950. Projections of sea-level rise of
90cm by the year 2100 – HUH? PROJECTIONS??? FOR GOODNESS SAKES – NEVER
MIND THE GOOD – OLD PROJECTIONS AND MODELLING SCAM – YOU PEOPLE DO NOT ABUSE
THINGS PROFESSIONALLY – NEVER MIND THAT YOU COMPARE WITH EARLIER FIGURE WHEN NO
SHIP _ OF FOOLS IDIOTS WERE EXTANT TO MEASURE OCEAN RISES – BUT THE FIGURES ARE
IMBECILIC VIA BASIC COMMON SENSE!!used to justify planning restrictions on
coastal property - require the rate of rise to increase to 15mm a year.
OH!
DO NOT GET ME STARTED ON THE COUNCILS’
FRAUDS!
HOWEVER YOUR FIGURES ARE FANTASY AND ART
LEAST ASININE.SURELY YOU SEE THAT?
WHY DID YOU NOT STICK TO SIMPLE LIES? YOU
HAVE CONSTRUCTED A TRITE PIECE OF DELIBERATE FRAUD THAT IS EITHER RISIBLE OR
TRAGIC OR BOTH, SURELY!
No comments:
Post a Comment