Submissions close on
Wednesday, 30 April 2014
NOTE PLEASE – I ALLOW
THIS TO BE PUBLISHED.
I herewith wish to make my submission with respect to the
Amendments to the Racial Discrimination Act.
My comments herein will not for now have sources and
supplementary comments relating to some of the claims
herein.
Instead the reader is invited to view my two main blogs
anytime after early early next week, when when these comments and sources etc.
can be seen. [Dates of entries will be May 1 – May 5]
Please note that all such entries - will be
prefixed with ‘’RDA’’ will be finished by Sunday 5 May 2014.
#######################################################################################################
Amendments to the Racial
Discrimination Act 1975
Hereunder are my comments which should be
view with my ‘’RDA’’ entries as above blogs.
1
FUREDY
I have seen The Australian making heroic efforts to distort
the 18c debate [henceforth ‘’RDA’’] over the past few months. This distortion is
exemplified by their publication over almost 2 weeks the lamentable,
extraordinary ideas of John J.
Furedy, Darling Point, NSW
There are so many strange things here. I do not know whether I
will devote time to analyse the scores of insults to my parents – they too were
survivors of the holocaust.
YES – I AM JEWISH!
My parents were indeed survivors of Nazi
barbarism!
My opinion – AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF JEWS*** is just as
viable as Furedy’s!
2
Just read the socialist pap of Furedy:
A boyhood
scepticism of powerful agendas built an unassailable view that speech was better
when it was free, even for Holocaust deniers, and led to Professor Furedy this
week backing proposed revisions to the Racial Discrimination
Act.
PUHLEEZ!
He was already a socialist twirp as a boy? He had this view
about ‘’powerful agendas’’? Get real – this is referring to those who hunted
Nazis! Sick!
3And the title of the article is absurd.
As can be seen from the link – Furedy lacks original titles at best: VELVET
TOTALITARIANISM is everywhere in his work:
4But leave that all for now – he is of the
left – thus his freedom of speech values never encompass that there is no such
thing!
It is a responsibility – not a unilateral right couched in
waffled troglodyte phrases like VELVET TOTALITARIANISM, powerful agendas; or
idiocies / obscenities like this:
‘’His father and two uncles were sent to different labour camps.
The uncles perished somewhere in Ukraine. His father, Bela, survived only
because a German colonel’s instincts to win the war were greater than his
instincts to kill Jews.
“He told my
father if you work like a soldier, you’ll be fed like a soldier — and he was,”
he said.
Professor
Furedy said free speech wouldn’t have saved the Jewish people under Hitler —
“there were so many other factors at play” — but was adamant it was the best way
to defeat bigotry.
“The only
protection against stupid speech is better speech,” he said.’’
5AND THIS: simply imbecilic!
‘’He said he did not believe minority groups needed
special protections, even where they had to fight back with ideas against a
powerful person with a stronger
platform.’’
OH
YES – FUREDY AGAINST THE NAZIS? THE MAN DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO
HIDE!
6AND THIS:
Notorious
Holocaust-denier and anti-Semite Ernst Zundel was in the midst of a deportation
battle with the Canadian government when Professor Furedy wrote a letter to the
National Post newspaper defending his right to free speech. “I have long been
disgusted by Zundel’s publicly stated, anti-Semitic opinions,” he wrote in
2005.
“Nevertheless, as one who has had first-hand experience of ...
‘fear societies’ in the form of the Nazi and Soviet tyrannies, I have, since
1987, defended, in print, Zundel’s right to publicly state his disgusting
opinions because I did not want to see a Canadian shift towards the fear end of
the free-fear continuum.”
The same
shift, he says, could happen in Australia and Senator Brandis is right to
correct it.
7
-
Let it be understood that Furedy is
allowed to be such a creature of the left that his entire raison d’etre
is the urge he has in supporting modern day nazis.
-
Let it be understood – he
can be discovered by The Australian and for The Oz to publish derivations of
Furedy via the letters and op Ed pieces for a very long 8 days!
-
Let it be understood
that I can argue to the contrary!
-
Let it be understood
that The Oz editorial denies democracy to Jews! see below! They vitiate the
majority view!!
‘’Some
within the Jewish diaspora disagree with the organisations’ official line. Such
individuals know that majority or official opinion among any group is not
necessarily always right.’’
‘’...always
right. Many racial and religious groups, including Jews, have learned, that
lesson at vast and painful cost through history. Free choice, including
opposition to cultural coercion, was one of the 10 founding principles of
Israel,HUH?????? which is also a good
reason for respecting dissenting views. HUH????
9AND LOOK AT
THIS!!!
MORONIC EDITORIAL Smothering
free exchange of ideas a dangerous path
10
DERSHOWITZ
It was not enough for
the Oz what they did with Furedy – they published the
abysmal self – contradictory article by Alan Dershovitz.
More to come on this.
11
JAMES ALLEN
Allen is a Garrick [who is Garrick?] Professor law of Qld Uni: he should
have been ashamed of writing this tripe insult – a biased piece of
self – absorbed rubbish! What an insult to Mr Mundine. The article is a
travesty.
More on this too.
12But here is the ‘rub’
These two very biased articles were published NEXT TO EACH OTHER –
promoting the same side!
Almost unprecedented for The Oz to be so manifestly incapable of
realizing how silly they look.
13These – and other articles are laden with mere
unilateral freedom of speech espousal.
And no mention of the responsibility.
But the worst by far is this.
ALL articles seemingly claim via various insipid phrases that one must
listen to the ultimate evil under the freedom / speech moniker!
-
Oh – and so many new cliches are created – like the market place of
ideas...
-
fee exchange of ideas
-
realm of ideas
-
first casualty / speech...
I could list scores more.
14But the worst idea is the plain scenario that one
should sit down in deferential obscenity with those who would deny the
essence
of MY VERONKA!!
Whither art though, free exchange of ideas – with those who would claim
that Hitler did not murder enough of us??!!
Or that the Jews bashed on the way home from synagogue should encourage
‘’airing of grievances’’? See below!!
Geoff Seidner
13 Alston Gr
East St Kilda 3183
03 9525 9299
#########################################################################################
9
AND LOOK AT
THIS!!!
Comment from gs:this
article is imbecilic at best! My extreme language is justified - not the least
because of this:
Nor, in Australia, has the controversial Section 18C
of the RDA prevented a 21 per cent increase in the number of reports of racist
violence directed at individuals or Jewish facilities in the past year. That
disturbing trend is a good reason for open debate and
the airing of grievances, to allow them to be dealt with by rational, sensible argument.
