Imbeciles Galore!
▼ April (17)
- 25/4: Sydney University Professor Jake Lynch gets ...
- 26/3: Israeli case against academic Jake Lynch an ...
From: g87
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 12:53 PM
To: drdannylamm@gmail.com ; julie nathan ; peter
wertheim ; drdannylamm@gmail.com ; zfa@zfa.com.au ; tatarka@vicbar.com.au ; aijac:TF
; rubenstein c
Subject: IMBECILES GALORE!
I will be posting this item on my blog in the next few minutes, with
various links to show what an immoral mess our troika of Jewish community groups
have made.
The ECAJ
ZFA
The Zionist Council Of Victoria.
These lunatics were so jealous of Shurat Hadin for DARING to take action
against the BDS entity in Sydney Uni – that they set out to actively undermine
Shurat Ha Din.
It was an astonishing act of treachery. Sadly it was also imbecilic as it
fails to get to any standards of primary school logic.
I was thinking of making a comparison with Kindergarten playtime – but that
would have been too brutal: and maybe even incorrect as little children have no
airs about them!
They learn consideration to authority figures in primary school.
LOOK WHAT HAPPENED!!
SURPRISE!!!
- 25/4: Sydney University Professor Jake Lynch gets ...
- 26/3: Israeli case against academic Jake Lynch an ...
Let them be thoroughly ashamed of themselves: it all encouraged the judge –
who in my opinion made basic errors in law – encouraged in that he had community
support!
Well – I have news for the judge: this is not so.
The vast majority of Jews can see the humbug from the troika!
Let it be understood that at least one person is prepared to expose them –
Geoff Seidner!
Oh – by the way – to the eternal credit of Danny Lamm Danny admitted months
ago - that whatever the merits of the case- the judge would be influenced by
the troika!
‘’COULD BE’’ he admitted.
It is time the troika admitted what they did and gave support to Shurat Ha
Din!
REAL SUPPORT!
May Hashem forgive them thus!
Geoff Seidner
The Executive
Council of Australian Jewry has issued a statement detailing their reasons as to
why they are not aligned with Israeli Human Rights group Shurat HaDin’s move to
litigate against a NSW professor who advocates BDS against Israeli
academics.
In a prepared
statement, executive director of The Executive Council of Australian Jewry,
Peter Wertheim states: “The campaign to boycott academic and other contacts with
Israel is repugnant to all who sincerely seek a just and lasting resolution of
the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians,” said Peter Wertheim, the
Executive Director of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ). “The
path to a just peace is through mutual engagement, not vilification. Contacts
between Israeli and Palestinian academics should be encouraged and facilitated
by their Australian and other colleagues, not
stigmatised.”
The ECAJ has
long been a vocal critic of the anti-Israel boycott campaign. “The boycott
campaign is a calculated attempt to demonise, isolate and ultimately dismantle
Israel through the distortion of international law and human rights. The
hate-filled protests outside Max Brenner chocolate shops and the ill-considered
scheme of Marrickville Council to boycott Israeli products at a cost of millions
of dollars to its rate-payers, which was subsequently abandoned, have rightly
been condemned and derided by most Australians. All major parties including the
Greens, except for a handful of their MP’s, disavow the anti-Israel boycott
campaign” Wertheim said.
“The ECAJ
believes that the most appropriate and effective way to combat the boycott
campaign is to expose its deceptive and sometimes racist rhetoric, methods and
aims public scrutiny. In our view, attempts to suppress the campaign through
litigation are inappropriate and likely to be counter-productive. It is for this
reason that the ECAJ has had no involvement in the action brought by Shurat
HaDin and will continue to fight the boycott campaign through public discourse.
If any individuals believe they have been adversely affected by racially
discriminatory policies and practices of the Centre for Peace and Conflict
Studies they are entitled to have their day in court, but we are opposed to
litigation if it is pursued merely as a political
tactic.”
Asked whether
he believes that all criticisms of Israel are antisemitic, Wertheim answered
“No. Israel is a vibrant pluralist democracy and its citizens – Jews, Bedouin,
Druze and other Israeli Arabs – are often its most incisive critics. But it is
also false to suggest that no criticisms of Israel are antisemitic. There is
clearly an overlap, as has been acknowledged by the European Agency for
Fundamental Rights, the United Kingdom All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into
Antisemitism, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and the
members of pa
BDS Litigation “inappropriate” says ECAJ » J-Wire
rliament from many countries, including Australia, who have signed the London Declaration on Combating
Antisemitism and the Ottawa Protocol on Combating
Antisemitism.”
No comments:
Post a Comment