The modus vivendi of this blog is plainly self explanatory. Pathetically,'progressives' regularly promote implausable, impractical or plainly asinine ideas. Who but socialists could for decades abuse the term 'economic rationalism' - without humiliation? THIS GOES TO THE VERY HEART OF ECONOMIC POLICY AND RATIONAL GOVERNMENT: TO WIT TO NOT CRITICIZE THE CONSERVATIVES AS BEING 'RATIONAL'!
My other main blog:
Thursday, 21 August 2014
TOM ELLIOTT IS DUPLICITUOUS RE ISRAEL
..... AND HE DOES NOT REPLY TO TOUGH EMAILS
But it is my fault: I made his position impossible
There is an arguably brilliant essay hereunder as well.
It is far from complete - but it may be a great read irrespective
Subject: Mandela and TU TU WERE NOT CREDIBLE TOM
bad this is unedited.
would not impeach anything if I was you_ there is brilliant material here!
3 43 pm you said to an Israel hater who claimed that Israel was an apartheid
state that ‘’ISRAEL IS NOT AS BAD’’ This fellow raised as many chimeras as he
liked ... and so you answered that ISRAEL IS NOT PERFECT’’
is as pathetic line – now Jews need perfection in politics?
pn earth can say this rubbish is of course always right ...it is a pathetic line
to invariably diminish Israel and prove critical JEW haters right!!
CAN NEVER BE RIGHT IF SHE IS NOT PERFECT!
perfection is allowing all propagandist evil re settlements... allowing return
of the Germans to Alsace and Lorraine,,, sarcasm here.. and the effective
destruction of Israel???
NEVER FORCING THE REMOVAL OF MURDER FROM ALL THEIR CONSTITUTIONS... Oh those
lovely holocaust denying Abbas PLO entities!!!
As Alsace and Moselle (northern Lorraine) were mostly inhabited
by German ... away from the Rhine would give the Germans a strategic advantage over the .... used the inhabitants of Alsace-Lorraine as pawns in the growing conflict between
Jul 18, 2011 - As seen in
this JTA Archive Timeline, Mandela's relationship with the Jewish .... leader of
the Nation of Islam famous for anti-Semitic remarks in the U.S. ... February 2003 -
Anti-Defamation League accuses Mandela of
''You cannot criticise Israel without being accused
of anti semitism.''
The above mealy - mouthed excuse for Jew hatred is often
antagonists of Israel to outrageously diminish Jews' right to
Structurally the words may change; but essentially our enemies
themselves via this pathetic contrived canard. It is about
that it was debunked and exposed for what it is: a chimera; a plain
Plain old antisemitism.
Take your pick: it is a grave error to suggest there is a difference that
1 It is my understanding that
it is theoretically; nay - ethereally possible for someone, somewhere, somehow -
to claim that their so - called 'criticism' is 'genuine' one and somehow their
humanrights are impinged in that this 'genuine,' good natured...ho
hum..'criticism' is being vitiated somehow by them not being 'allowed' to
'Naturally' these denizens or
champions of the ethic of virtuous criticism DCEV (oh, another avronym!) will
have taken offence at being accused of AS So here is the first
Merely by claiming that they,
the poor dears are so accused they think / try to gain the upper hand AKA the
mantle of victimhood by say, labelling. Oh shock horror..... quelle horreur!
The left like throwing the label moniker Xxxxxxx around ..thanks to
There is no doubt that they ...... the latest incantation of anti
semites who rail against the title , have not reached the depravity of Sydney
university where in the annals or to use a more genteel word devoid of
connotations...corridors..of the playroom of the Peace and Conflated
Studies....they espouse that AS is acceptable.....!
I guess these mavens of boycotterie will eventually progress to the
stage that they will be able with honour to the Nazis... stand for parliament on
the ticket that Hitler did not murder enough Jews and they feel honour bound to
You see reader... this is not merer rhetorical exaggeration. We have in
Oz already progressed to the utilitarian stage...see above... how far to the
senate? for acceptability?
Is it not sad I say that one has to resort to parody, sarcasm,
rhetoric....... that these entities are not being deprived of human rights in
...via their pathetic claim in effect that Israel is defacto getting an easy
ride... because this is what they are essentially claiming.
At the same time asglibly outrageously using nazi moniker and demanding
Is this not obvious that they do not act in good faith?
Let us askk these ignoble entities; exactly what dlse could...should
Israel encourage yo... no enablre you to so plainly venomously spout forth?
Perhaps this is my real message in this
2 [to be edited
This phrase is a relative recent
inculcation in media and is seemingly difficult to rebut because it is set
up via the not so obvious classical paradox. Criticism is
reasonable Vitiating any criticism is unreasonable. Therefore criticism of
Israel is reasonable. Thus any criticism of Israel is extended given
credibility / license! It plainly, indubitably follows on,
non? NON!!! It is a surprisingly how effective this ruse has become - a
non sequitur that hails from the dubious idea that an apple is a fruit, a
pear is a fruit therefore a pear is an apple. 1
My main concern is that reasonable
people who rail against the obvious deceit implicit in the title of this
essay do not know how to respond.
Intelligent, brilliant aggression is
the way to rebut it. This seems to be one one hand obvious and sadly
misplaced on the basis that I am suggesting that they will listen to reason.
Indeed inveterate haters will not.
But that misses the point.
Completely. It is a lot better to attack than what is often proffered by our
Too often I hear the phrase 'that you
can indeed criticise Israel but it has to be 'reasonable' and she must not
be held to a standard higher / not expected of other people / countries'.
Sigh! A certain loser that by it's very nature almost encourages a distorting
rejoinder. The above is sadly utterly inadequate simply because not only
is it weak, but our antagonists gleefully ignore it. And Abuse it in the way
they abuse all good - faith comments from reasonable people. Manifestly
because it lends itself to innumerable distortions.
It should not surprise that the case
for Israel is lost via the inevitable rejoinder by those who brutalize
the naive with innumerable tripe and deliberate lies. Indeed - it is easy
to get around the 'standard response' because it lends itself to mealy -
THIS IS THE BEST IDEA _
HARDLY RECOGNIZED AS SUCH: IT BEATS ANYTHING I HAVE EVER
SO I VERILY SAY: Impeach the integrity, motivations
vivendi of those who
proffer the above plain nonsense.
Challenge them to make single discrete claims
without shifting ground
when that claim is proven
Put to them that the so - called 'criticism of Israel' is
their modern - day derivated justification
for their very being - Jew
Challenge them: so many excellent sources for
proving that Jew
anti semitism / anti Zionism and so - called
criticism - of -
Israel are essentially the same.
One needs merely to read what the
great Martin Luther King Jnr. espoused.
that there are multiple sources for MLK associating anti - Zionism
but classical distortion is manifest in claims that one of
the sources may
have been 'suspect.' There are adequate sources
for his wonderful words. See