From: g87
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 2:24 PM
To: 4CORNERS-NEWS@YOUR.ABC.NET.AU ;
Corporate_Affairs2.ABC@abc.net.au
; mitchell c ; skinzie@newscorp.com ; janet
albrechtsen ; gsheridan@theaustralian.com.au
; Julie Bishop ; salusinszkyi@theaustralian.com.au
; julie nathan ;
peter
wertheim ; alex.rice@aph.gov.au ; bernardi cory ; David Southwick ; dominique james ; greg.hunt.mp@aph.gov.au ; Josh Freidenberg ; Julie
Bishop ; libs@vic.liberal.org.au ; michael obrien ; Senator.Ronaldson@aph.gov.au
Cc:
Subject: ANSWER DEMANDED RE FRAUD
ABC HEADQUARTERS
CC to Julie Bishop
I direspectfully demand an answer from BOOB CARR /
ABC and C Mitchell / The Oz/ Lyons/ to this.
It is a shameful chapter in Australia’s
history
ANSWER DEMANDED RE FRAUD
It is about time the
greatest political spin of recent times was disabused: I put it to the reader;
do not believe the left who try to prove the veracity of their articles /
verbiage
There are two
possibilities:**** they are merely lying or plainly lying!
Here is Carr's nefarious article.
Bob Carr is good at both
forms of lies. By the way - I hope he sues me. Sadly he no longer has a public
email address in my ken. Such a fall.
His miserable article
rests on both forms of lies.
Let me take you to the
latter.
Carr spends his life
crawling, trawling through whatever may help his anti - semitic
cause.
His modus vivendi of
course demonstrates what sort of person he is.. Because proper research is not
his game.
Indeed - he takes words /
whatever may be helpful - preferably from friends of Israel and inverts context,
no matter how shallow or absurd or plain the distortion.
It never seems absurd the
way Carr does it.
It is plain how he gets
away with it.
- He relies on the ignorance of most reasonable people: who plainly accept that 'it must be correct.'
- One has to understand there are few people in the public domain whose comments cannot be abused by the likes of Carr. So paradoxically the quotes are seemingly correct. Even entirely correct. But the man destroys meaningful context - and glibly cares not.
- Worse - much worse is this tangent which Carr purports to not understand. People can throughout their life can make disparate comments that may not be correct for our times. That is context, Bobbness Carr!
- Or may be incorrect - and may be a harmless, erroneous rubbish for which the person should never be held responsible. Eg the Moshe Dayan quote. Not for Carr, of course. His game is professional media spin!
- Take Carr's Levy Eshkol quote.It is embelished with The holocaust via a dubious entity: you cannot get much worse!
- But wait - there is more! Carr attacks Israel re the idiotic socialist idea that [socialist!] kibbutz life - good - settling in Israel bad. Apologies to the Orwell.
- Abusing Golda Meir via her harmless quote is plain stupid. [See below enlarged link.]
- But by now Carr no longer cares: he thinks he has transported the reader into his world where like the left - we cannot think for ourselves. Well - I CAN, you fool Carr! Why not use a real quote Carr? SEE BELOW
- He attacks AIJAC and misquotes his successor the esteemed Julie Bishop! Shame on Carr.
- Never mind his his on his favourite toy - the Geneva Convention and International Law: simply dishonest.
- I guess I have no time to teach him about how many Jews were murdered beause of 1944 perceptions of so - called International Law. Remember The Exodus? Of course. Carr was rejoicing in his mother's womb!
- And the quotes re anti - semitic Thoreux? And Kerry and Obama more! Shame: see my earlier assay on what low - lifes they are.
- Especially Obama.Kerry!! ''...warned Israel last month of the danger of delegitimisation, especially after the EU announced any economic treaties with Israel would carefully exclude - one may say boycott - business activity in Israeli settlements.''
- THE ABOVE IS SICK! KERRY HAS ELSEWHERE PLAINLY EXCUSED ANY TERRORIST ACTION BY THE PLO.And the above re BDS IS NO BETTER!!
- But as a finale - contemplate how sick is Carr's quote re Kerry! In and of itself above - and his complete disregard for morality!
Now - to end this - LOOK: THE ABC AND LYONS AND CARR
WERE LYING!!
SEE THIS!! Just like Jenin - all
lies!!
http://cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com.au/2014/02/13214-lyons-and-abc-lies-re-idf-detains.html
Geoff
Seidner
Too bad I have no time to
edit this!
######################
http://cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com.au/2014/02/my-email-9214-i-denounce-john-lyons-and.html
*****
##########################################
EX # 7 above:
http://cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com.au/2014/02/my-email-9214-i-denounce-john-lyons-and.html
I quote Golda Meir in 1957: there were no Palestinians then, by the way! This phrase has too been distorted on the web, by the way.
“Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us.” (Statement to the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., 1957)
Oh, Golda, Golda – so much has happened since your days.
Geoff Seidner
##########################################
-
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Me_and_the_Colonel
ANY
confusion about Israel’s settlements in the West Bank can be easily resolved.
There is a file in the office of the Israeli Prime Minister that will do
it.
The file would be handy for John Kerry
as he attempts to broker a peace. It would help Julie Bishop, who told The Times
of Israel on January 15 she’d like to see advice that says settlements are
illegal.
It was this advice that an Israeli prime
minister asked for in 1967. Israel had just conquered what is now the West Bank.
Prime minister Levi Eshkol asked Israel’s top authority on international law,
Theodor Meron, whether Israel could settle civilians
there.
Meron was a child survivor of the
Holocaust and has since become one of the world’s leading authorities on the
laws of war and a judge on the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former
Yugoslavia.
His advice was unequivocal, and today he
sticks to it. He said: “Civilian settlement in the administered territories
contravenes explicit provisions of the Fourth Geneva
Convention.”
When General Moshe Dayan in 1968
proposed building Israeli towns on the West Bank he blithely conceded: “Settling
Israelis in administered territories, as is known, contravenes international
conventions ... “
Indeed, the Fourth Geneva Convention
would appear to leave no room for argument. It states: “The occupying power
shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the
territory it occupies.”
Apologists for settlements try to argue
that Article 49 bars the occupier only from “forced transfer” (my emphasis) of
its civilians. This is not the interpretation accepted by the International
Court of Justice or anyone else. The adjective “forced” does not appear in the
convention.
I think I recognise a killer argument
when I see one. The killer argument here is that Israel’s own legal authority,
at the very start, told its government that settlements were illegal under
international law.
It’s curious that supporters of Israel
would choose to fight on this ground - their weakest.
When I was foreign minister the
Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council directed a furious effort at
trying to block even routine criticism of settlements, as if this were more
vital than advocating a two-state solution or opposing boycotts of Israel.
Settlers themselves shatter all sympathy, as on the ABC’s Four Corners on Monday
when Daniella Weiss stated they deliberately had occupied land to block the
creation of a Palestinian state because “this land was promised to the Jewish
nation by God”.
In Louis Theroux’s BBC documentary The
Ultra Zionists, religious settlers declared Palestinians an inferior race. “This
is the Jewish homeland and there’s never been a Palestinian people,” declared
one, standing on a property formerly occupied by Palestinians. In one blast they
defied centuries of priceless Jewish liberal and humanitarian
instinct.
No one from the centre-Left of European
politics is going to do anything other than repudiate this ultra-religious
vision. “The kibbutz used to be the symbol of Israel,” a British Labour MP told
me. “Now it’s the settlement bloc.” American Jewry is increasingly detaching
itself from what it sees as a chauvinist, illiberal strain in Israeli
politics.
Kerry warned Israel last month of the
danger of delegitimisation, especially after the EU announced any economic
treaties with Israel would carefully exclude - one may say boycott - business
activity in Israeli settlements.
I know some supporters of Israel would
want to point out that there are a range of settlement categories. My response
is to quote Israeli prime minister Golda Meir, who once said: “If you’ve got to
explain, you’ve lost already.”
In any case, there is available a far
more intelligent defence of Israel. Concede that the settlement mission is
controversial within Israel. Point out many Israelis are opposed to the settler
vision of a greater Israel indefinitely governing a majority Arab population.
Give up any argument that settlements are legal under international law and move
on to more fruitful territory.
Insist that liberal democracy and
shining economic success - even with constant threat of war - are the chief
virtues of Israel, a state where six former heads of its security agency, Shin
Bet, can appear in a documentary (The Gatekeepers) and criticise Israel’s
occupation of the West Bank, a state where its own Supreme Court can overrule
its government on use of torture or the direction of a wall opposed by
Palestinian villagers, where historians freely challenge their country’s own
foundation myth. Where, as Four Corners showed, its military personnel can speak
out against the occupation.
In all these respects, Israel presents a
benchmark of pluralism and democracy - a formidable one - for a future
Palestinian entity. If Palestinians achieved it, they would set off a challenge
to Arab dictatorship and theocracy everywhere and realise their own
greatness.
Bob Carr
was Australia’s foreign minister from March 2012 to September last year and was
NSW premier from 1995 to
2005.
No comments:
Post a Comment