From: g87
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:21 PM
To: the australian
Subject: Is that all there is to Carr's love?
Is that all there is to Carr’s love?
Bob Carr and
Labor are great for non - creative, disingenuous 'twaddled' cliches like
''enhanced Palestinian status in the UN'' in describing Australia's
shameful status in creating said absurd status for any / all Palestinian
groups.
It matters
not to Carr that tiny democratic Israel is defacto being forced to give up ever
- greater territory for the sop of the non - credible
mellifluous – sounding so - called 'two - state solution.'
This will
come about via in the magic - mushroom world in which our Foreign Minister
resides.
- Glibly he ignores what is openly stated in the Palestinian Authority and Hamas' Constitutions about destroying Israel. it is not a secret.
- Ethereally he merely ask the nice terrorists to stop bombing Israel. His ''communique urged the Palestinians to resolve their internal differences and cease acts of violence against Israel and in particular, to abide by the terms of the Gaza ceasefire and to stop all rocket attacks.".Internal differences, huh? Nice one that! Is that all there is to love, Carr style?
- Or pleasantly points out that: '' Also, on January 7, I said Hamas must recognise "the reality of Israel" and "the need to have a settlement in the Middle East based on recognition of Israel, security for Israel, and a Palestinian state". That is the language we want to hear emerging from Gaza.’’ Really! Diplomatic twaddle with a twange of Orwellian humbug! Or as Julia sadly, pathetically said – ‘’We are us’’ Indeed this is Carrspeak. Laborspeak. Diplomatic verbiage galore.
- Absurdly the innate contradiction in the above with seemingly accepting Israeli settlements as above and how he '' wanted to send a message to Israel on settlements'' does not occur to Carr.
- Indeed - BC also touts the following: '' ...but also let Palestinians know there is no substitute for direct negotiations without preconditions'' It never occurs to his Bobness that negotiations are innately impossible with enemies who openly want to kill your children et al – who will talk only through terror – as espoused in their written constitutions.
Geoff
Seidner
13 Alston
Gr
East St Kilda
3183
03 9525
9299
sop (s
p)
p)
tr.v. sopped, sop·ping, sops
1.
To dip, soak, or drench in a liquid;
saturate.
2.
To take up by absorption: sop up water
with a paper towel.
n.
1.
A piece of food soaked or dipped in a
liquid.
2.
a.
Something yielded to placate or
soothe.
b.
A
bribe.
standard operating procedure
n.
1.
Established procedure to be followed
in carrying out a given operation or in a given
situation.
2.
A specific procedure or set of
procedures so established.
There is no evidence for this. Nor is there evidence of US
annoyance with Britain, France, Germany, Holland or any of the Scandinavian
countries that also either abstained or voted yes on the question of enhanced
Palestinian status in the UN.
As with us, the other US allies who abstained wanted to send a
message to Israel on settlements but also let Palestinians know there is no
substitute for direct negotiations without
preconditions.
You say there was no reference to those who want to destroy Israel
in the communique after the January 18 talks between me and British Foreign
Secretary William Hague. In fact that communique urged the Palestinians to
"resolve their internal differences and cease acts of violence against Israel"
and in particular, to "abide by the terms of the Gaza ceasefire and to stop all
rocket attacks".
Also, on January 7, I said Hamas must recognise "the reality of
Israel" and "the need to have a settlement in the Middle East based on
recognition of Israel, security for Israel, and a Palestinian state". That is
the language we want to hear emerging from Gaza.
Bob Carr, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Canberra,
ACT
No comments:
Post a Comment