Sent from my iPad
On 30/12/2013, at 3:24 PM, "g87" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Hi Peter,Please note that George Brandis has responded to you in today’s The Oz. It was inevitable. The A - G is of course very generous to you in his carefully considered item.I am of course not so encumbered with trying to optimise my electoral popularity VS the need to respond to your pretty outrageous efforts.Fortunate perhaps is that most people are on hols.You should contemplate my heroic incipient efforts. I have lots of interests – and have tried to invent a means of stopping time.You will see my response reasonably soon.Note also that Catalaxy has also taken the ‘parody weapon’ to you. See below.Do you intend a decko at the comments?Other salient links will be posted as convenient during the silly season; we are regularly taking days off to be with the grandchildren and whatever else we pick to relax with.I somehow hope we all continue to have fun at your expense.As a further aside: you should really not continue this farce in yet another column.Sadly – you may just do that.RegardsGeoff
Sinclair Davidson posted: "Peter van Onselen has put out a pollie watch list for 2014. So he has 5 on the up and 5 on the down. It is the on the down choices that I'm interested in. First he nominates Wayne Swan - but Swan has more or less disappeared from public life, if not actu"
Good luck with it Geoff, do get back to me when you have some substantial and cogent words completed. I look forward to reading it if you manage to follow through on this commitment.RegardsPeter
Sent from my iPad
On 29/12/2013, at 2:31 PM, "g87" <email@example.com> wrote:Hello PeterCongratulations,You have in your two recent articles given me enough incentive to base a major essay, thesis, monograph or even a book on the subject ofMEDIA MANIPULATION AND INSULTS TO THE INTELLIGENCE.I may change the nomenclature – but methinks some people may recognize that it will be based on theWINTROP PROFESSOR OF JOURNALISM AT WA UNI.I will send you advance copies as I write it: you may be prepared to comment on salient segments.Oh – by the way – I will try to find room for Emmerson: remember him?His article is right next to yours in Saturday’s Oz.Yours SincerelyGeoff SeidnerDecember (66)
This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee, you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of the sending company must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by that company or any of its related entities. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachments are free from computer virus or other defect.