http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_was_a_dark_and_stormy_night
Articles herein make the ECAJ position more absurd.
Even with due consideration to the inevitable duplication in my efforts - particularly the links - on any reasonable reading it is expected that they will find a way of backing down with the esteemed brilliant Attorney General George Brandis and perhaps the similar Tim Wilson!
Geoff Seidner
SEE A MINI ESSAY BELOW... to be completed one day soon..
In response to the pathetic letter from Lee Rhiannon yesterday.
http://cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/no-hate-for-israel-rhiannon-1912.html
See letter here:
http://cognatesocialistdystopia.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/rhiannons-motives-great-letter-2012.html
GS
#########################################################
#########################################################
LINKS FROM TODAY MAINLY:
December (40)
- YESTERDAY'S CUT AND PASTE RE University boycott..1...
- How to win war with bikie gangs
- Wilson laughs off his Twitter-zone critics
- Rhiannon's motives great letter 20/12
- Letters 20/12 Hopes for free speech...
- Legal Affairs: Rights commission's odd man out...2...
#####################################################
#####################################################
20 Dec 2013 work in progress
''You cannot criticise Israel without being accused of
anti semitism.''
The above mealy - mouthed excuse for Jew hatred is often
used by antagonists of Israel to outrageously diminish Jews' right to
their homeland.
Structurally the words may change; but essentially our enemies identify
themselves via this pathetic contrived canard. It is about time
that it was debunked and exposed for what it is: a chimera; a plain derivative of
- Jew hatred.
- Plain old antisemitism.
- Anti Zionism.
Take your pick: it is a grave error to suggest there is any real difference
The title of this essay is a relatively recent inculcation in media and is seemingly difficult to rebut
because it is set up via the not so obvious classical paradox.
- Criticism is reasonable
- Vitiating any criticism is unreasonable.
- Therefore criticism of Israel is reasonable.
- Thus any criticism of Israel is extended given credibility / license!
- It plainly, indubitably follows on, non?
NON!!!
It is a surprisingly how effective this ruse has become - a non sequitur that hails
from the dubious idea that an apple is a fruit, a pear is a fruit therefore a pear is
an apple. 1
My main concern is that reasonable people who rail against the obvious deceit herein
do not know how to respond.
do not know how to respond.
Intelligent, brilliant aggression is the way to rebut it. This seems to be one one
hand obvious and sadly misplaced on the basis that I am suggesting that they
will listen to reason. Indeed inveterate haters will not.
But that misses the point. Completely.
It is a lot better to attack than what is often proffered by our people:
Too often I hear the phrase 'that you can
indeed criticise Israel but it has to be
'reasonable' and she must not be held to a
standard higher / not expected of other
people / countries'. Sigh! A certain loser that
by it's very nature almost encourages a distorting rejoinder.
RECOGNIZED AS SUCH: IT BEATS
ANYTHING I HAVE EVER SEEN!!
SO I VERILY SAY: Impeach the integrity, motivations
and modus vivendi of those who
by it's very nature almost encourages a distorting rejoinder.
The above is sadly utterly inadequate simply because not
only is it weak, but our antagonists gleefully ignore
it. And Abuse it in the way they abuse all good - faith
comments from reasonable people. Manifestly because
it lends itself to innumerable distortions.
it. And Abuse it in the way they abuse all good - faith
comments from reasonable people. Manifestly because
it lends itself to innumerable distortions.
It should not surprise that the case for Israel is lost
via the inevitable rejoinder by those who brutalize the
naive with innumerable tripe and deliberate lies.
via the inevitable rejoinder by those who brutalize the
naive with innumerable tripe and deliberate lies.
Indeed - it is easy to get around the 'standard
response' because it lends itself to mealy - mouthed
attacks.
THIS IS THE BEST IDEA _ HARDLYresponse' because it lends itself to mealy - mouthed
attacks.
RECOGNIZED AS SUCH: IT BEATS
ANYTHING I HAVE EVER SEEN!!
SO I VERILY SAY: Impeach the integrity, motivations
and modus vivendi of those who
proffer the above plain nonsense.
Challenge them to make single discrete claims
without shifting ground when that claim is proven
false.
without shifting ground when that claim is proven
false.
Put to them that the so - called 'criticism of Israel' is
merely their modern - day derivated justification
for their very being - Jew hatred.
Challenge them: so many excellent sources for
proving that Jew Hatred /
anti semitism / anti Zionism and so - called
criticism - of - Israel are essentially the same.
One needs merely to read what the late,
criticism - of - Israel are essentially the same.
One needs merely to read what the late,
great Martin Luther King Jnr. espoused.
Note that there are multiple sources for MLK associating anti - Zionism
with AS: but classical distortion is manifest in claims that one of
the sources may have been 'suspect.' There are adequate sources
for his wonderful words. See links above.
The best argument... cont. here...
The argument to postulate is plainly predicated on
the eternal idea that one must impeach and 'attack'
the antagonist - whose motivations are indeed
suspect.Willfully - blind is an elegant phrase.
It is as simple as that: accept that it is not merely a
matter of claiming truth in a defacto debate: you have
to take use the aggression / best form of defence
tactic.
And impeaching the enemy / activist can be simple
as 'bashing' them with perhaps a few of the below.
Do not accuse me of over - complicating it: some or
Do not accuse me of over - complicating it: some or
most may be adequate.
TO BE CONTINUED
GS
TO BE CONTINUED
GS
No comments:
Post a Comment