The modus vivendi of this blog is plainly self explanatory. Pathetically,'progressives' regularly promote implausable, impractical or plainly asinine ideas. Who but socialists could for decades abuse the term 'economic rationalism' - without humiliation? THIS GOES TO THE VERY HEART OF ECONOMIC POLICY AND RATIONAL GOVERNMENT: TO WIT TO NOT CRITICIZE THE CONSERVATIVES AS BEING 'RATIONAL'!
My other main blog:
Monday, 23 December 2013
PVO responds again: Of Viccisitudes and muting the enemy
won’t read it but wish you the best with your thoughts, I just don’t have time,
or the energy, to read that kind of stuff, no offence.
Brandis, yes he challenged my claim that Tim W is a partisan, but I invite you
and Brandis to actually look up the definition of the word ‘partisan’. Once you
do you will see even in his letter today Mr Brandis accidently pointed out that
Tim is in fact a partisan. But let me also point this out to you – I assume you
are able to see the logic of it – if Tim W isn’t partisan, bc as Brandis says he
from time to time doesn’t follow the party line of his political party, what was
Brandis doing calling Tim S a partisan, seeing as Tim S also doesn’t always
follow the party line of his party – eg on refugees and immigration matters?
Very funny that the AG couldn’t see that was where his logic took him…Ooops!
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Monday, 23 December 2013 9:29
AM To: Van Onselen, Peter Subject: Greetings
for your comments.
the circumstances there is no way I wish to create a problem by communicating
with you by further on this subject: I guess any subject.
could take it as harassment – and unless you so indicate to the contrary you may
need to merely secretly look at my blog from time to time. It will rapidly move
from PVO soon. May you write quality items with considered thought in
that the Attorney General George Brandis has also taken you to task this morning
in The Australian. He is being generous to you: he is a politician after all.
Maybe I too should have been ‘generous’. There are so many twirps of the left:
why did I pick on you?
I promise not to tell if you have a ‘decko’ at my next few entries on my
message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential
information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the
addressee indicated in this message or responsible for delivery of the message
to the addressee, you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to
anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments
and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and
its attachments which does not relate to the official business of the sending
company must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by that company or any
of its related entities. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachments are
free from computer virus or other defect.